Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation
right to livelihood article 21 pavement dwellers eviction right to life
Held: Held that right to livelihood is part of right to life under Article 21.
Ratio decidendi
Right to livelihood is an integral facet of Article 21 (right to life).
Cited by 12 of 95 judgments in this corpus
- KRISHNADATT AWASTHY v. STATE OF M.P. & ORS. · 2025 INSC 126
- S. RAJASEEKARAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. · 2025 INSC 1189
- RAJEEB KALITA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. · 2025 INSC 75
- YERIKALA SUNKALAMMA & ANR. v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE & ORS. · 2025 INSC 383
- IN RE: ZUDPI JUNGLE LANDS versus · 2025 INSC 754
- STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATI RAJ, LUCKNOW v. RAM PRAKASH SINGH · 2025 INSC 555
- K. PRABHAKAR HEGDE v. BANK OF BARODA · 2025 INSC 997
- KRISHNADATT AWASTHY v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. · 2024 INSC 252
- ABHIMEET SINHA & ORS. v. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA & ORS. · 2024 INSC 381
- MADHYAMAM BROADCASTING LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. · 2023 INSC 324
- LOMBARDI ENGINEERING LIMITED v. UTTARAKHAND JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED · 2023 INSC 976
- STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS v. RAJESH AGARWAL & ORS · 2023 INSC 303
These judgments mention this one. Whether each followed, distinguished or doubted it is not recorded here — read them before relying on any of it.