CWJC/960/2026 of Rajaram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.960 of 2026
======================================================
Rajaram Kumar Son of Jagdis Mahto, Resident of Village-Siyani, P.S.
Karande, District-Sheikhpura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principle Secretary Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Commissioner, Munger.
4. The District Magistrate cum The Collector, Sheikhpura, District-Sheikhpura.
5. The District Settlement, Sheikhpura.
6. The D.C.L.R., Sheikhpura.
7. The Additional District Magitrate cum Additional Collector, Sheikhpura.
8. The Sub Divisional Officer, Chewara P.S. Chewara, District-Sheikhpura.
9. The Block Development Officer, Chewara, P.S. Chewara, District-
Sheikhpura.
10. The Circle Officer, Chewara, P.S. Chewara, District-Sheikhpura.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (4)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 15-04-2026 Heard Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for
the petitioner and the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the
following relief(s):
“I. For a directing and commanding to
the respondents for entry the correct details of
plots and thereafter prepared the Land Parcel Map
of ancestral land of the petitioner which by the
survey officer has been wrongly prepared LMP and
misleading manner.
II. For correction of the land records and
Patna High Court CWJC No.960 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026
2/2
LMP (Land Parcel Map) as per lawful partition
and possession and protection of the petitioner’s
property rights.
III. For any other substantial
relief/reliefs for which petitioner is entitled for by
this Hon’ble Court in the fact and circumstances.”
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the appropriate
Revenue Authority/competent Court for the redressal of the
grievance.
4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Adnan/-
(Rajiv Roy, J)
U