CR. MISC./7636/2026 of Ramesh Rai @ Ramesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7636 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-406 Year-2025 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramesh Rai @ Ramesh Kumar S/O Babu Lal Rai R/O Village- Saguniya .P.S- Chiraiya ,District-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 17-02-2026 Heard Mr. Ritesh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 406 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 87 of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution in short is that one Anjesh Kumar has abducted the wife of the informant. It is further alleged that the petitioner, along with others, has a role in the conspiracy. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner is separate from Anjesh Kumar in mess and residence. The main thrust of the allegation is against Anjesh Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7636 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/2 Kumar. He also submits that the occurrence is of 30.08.2025, whereas this case was filed on 18.09.2025, which is a delay of eighteen days in filing this case and the delay has not been explained. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 03.10.2025 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case , this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail . The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 406 of 2025. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T