CR. MISC./19762/2026 of LALO YADAV Vs The State of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19762 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2020 Thana- BANMANKHI District- Purnia
======================================================
Lalo Yadav S/o Batal Yadav R/o Vill.- Teknawa, Ward no. 9, P.S.- Saur Bazar,
Dist.- Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 25-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection
with Banmankhi P.S. Case No.307 of 2020 registered for the
offence punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian
Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the
petitioner has kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the order of the
learned trial court it will transpire that the learned trial court has
recorded that the victim has given her statement under Sections
180 and 183 of the BNSS wherein she has stated that the
petitioner forcibly boarded her on his bike. In her statement
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19762 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
2/2
under Section 183 of the BNSS she has stated that she is aged
about 13 years. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further
submitted that only allegation against the petitioner is that he
has taken away the minor daughter of the informant who was
recovered after eight days. There is no any other allegation
against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has
further submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal
antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 23.04.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP
for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail . The above named
petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1 st Purnea in connection
with Banmankhi P.S. Case No.307 of 2020.
durgesh/-
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
U T