CR. MISC./79792/2025 of Abhishekh Singh Vs The State of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79792 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2023 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna
======================================================
Abhishekh Singh S/o- Ram Naresh Singh Resident of Village- Deokuli PS-
Bihta, Dist- Patna
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sulekha Devi w/o- Late Sanjay Verma R/v- Bhimnichak Ps- Dulhin Bazar
Dist- Patna
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s: Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
4 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is
apprehending his arrest in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S.
Case No. 170 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable
under Sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is to cheat the
informant for a sum of Rs. Seven (7) Lakhs which was alleged
to be withdrawn from her bank account by the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submitted that after the death of husband of the
informant, the petitioner was residing with the informant for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79792 of 2025(4) dt.25-02-2026
2/3
long years and he used to care her and her children. It is
submitted that petitioner is the cousin brother-in-law of
informant.
5. It is submitted that out of family acquaintance and,
as both were living together, on different occasion, some
money was given to the petitioner and when petitioner make a
plan to left the house of informant and to shift somewhere
else, the money, which was given to the petitioner, was asked
to return by the informant, and when the petitioner failed to
do so, the present false case was lodged. Petitioner claimed
clean antecedent.
6. Arguing further, it is submitted that at best, it is a
civil suit qua recovery of loan/dues.
7. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
8. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by
taking note of the fact as dispute primarily appears civil in
nature qua recovery of loan/dues, where petitioner claimed
clean antecedent, accordingly, above-named petitioner, in the
event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79792 of 2025(4) dt.25-02-2026
3/3
from this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on
furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Judicial Magistrate - 1 st Class, Danapur, District -
Patna/concerned court in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S.
Case No. 170 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the
Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short “B.N.S.S.”).
Rajeev/-
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
U T