WP/24160/2008 of E.SRINIVASAN Vs THE COMMISSIONER

W.P.No.24160 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR W.P.No.24160 of 2008 1.E.Srinivasan 2.P.Madheswaran 3.R.Jaganathan ... Petitioners vs 1.The Commissioner Salem City Municipal Corporation Salem. 2. Murugan S/o.Arumugam, Sanitary Worker, Hastampatti Zone Salem City Municipal corporation Salem. 3.S.Thirumurgam S/o Subramani Sanitary Worker, Hastampatti Zone Salem City Municipal corporation Salem. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24160 of 2008 4.G.Dhanapal S/o Govindan Sanitary Worker, Hastampatti Zone Salem City Municipal corporation Salem. 5.V.Periasamy S/o Veerabatran Sanitary Worker, Zone IV Salem City Municipal corporation Salem. 6. V.Saravan, S/o Veerabatran Sanitary Worker, Zone IV Salem City Municipal corporation Salem. … Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for t he records of the first respondent relating to the orders in Na.Ka.No.C2/3172/2005 dated 20.06.2008, quash the same in so far as it relates to placement of the petitioners and respondents 2 to 6 herein and issue directions to the first res pondent to fix the seniority of the petitioners over and above the respondents 2 to 6 here in and to consequently promote the petitioners as Driver prior to the promotion of respondents 2 to 6. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24160 of 2008 For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ravi For Respondents : M/s.N.Devi, Standing Counsel for R1 Batta due for R2 to R6. O R D E R When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned sta nding counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent submit that the petiti oners have addressed a letter to the first respondent informing the authority tha t they would not precipitate the matter and would withdraw the writ petition. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent submitting as above has placed before this Court, the copy of the letters as furnished by the petitioners herein. 3. On the aforesaid submission being made by the learned standing counsel, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Court may record the aforesaid submissions made by the learned standing counsel appear ing on behalf of the first respondent of the petitioners submitting letters not to precipitate the matter and also withdrawing the writ petition and close the present writ petition. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24160 of 2008 4. Having regard to the submissions made as above and taking note of the fact that the petitioners themselves have approached the first r espondent and addressed letters to the first respondent seeking for withdrawal of t he present writ petition (i.e.,) WP.No.24160 of 2008, this Court is of the view that there i s no necessity to proceed with the matter further. The copies of the letter addressed by the petitioners to the first respondent are taken up on record. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. 27.04.2026 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No tsh To The Commissioner Salem City Municipal Corporation Salem. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24160 of 2008 T. VINOD KUMAR , J. tsh W.P.No.24160 of 2008 27.04.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis