CRL OP/8553/2026 of Boopathi Vs The State Rep by The Sub-Inspector of Police,

CRL OP No.8553 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No.8553 of 2026 Boopathi S/o.Arumugam Door.No.4/348 Vetri Vinayagar Koil Street, Sanniyasikundu Main Road, Kitchipalayam, Salem. ...Petitioner/Accused Vs The State Rep by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kitchipalayam Police Station, Salem District. Crime No.337 of 2025 ...Respondent/ Complainant Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B NSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arr est by the respondent police pending investigation in Crime No. 337 of 2025 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Narayanaswamy For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.8553 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 132, and 351(3) of BNS 2023, in Crime No.337 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner belonged to a particular party, and he objected to the road laying under the Gover nment Scheme and also picked a quarrel with the Block Development Officer/de-facto complainant and abused him in filthy language and threatened him wit h dire consequences. Hence, the case. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the occurrence took place on 31.10.2025. According to the petitioner, the entire occurrence took place as he questioned the quality of the road, and thereby, the fa lse complaint has been registered against him. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.8553 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 5. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would strongly oppose the anticipatory bail application on the ground that this petitioner has assaulted a public ser vant, namely, the Block Development Officer (BDO); and that he has got five previous cases in Crime No. 97 of 2020, Salem Town Police Station; Crime No. 12 of 2022, Pallapatti Police Station; Crime No. 309 of 2023, Attur Polic e Station; and Crime Nos. 353 and 368 of 2024, Kondalampatti Police Station. 6. From the above detailing of the crime numbers, this Court could able to see the conduct and character of the petitioner. The criminal ante cedents palpably demonstrate that he is of the person misusing the liberty and subverting the justice. Therefore, this Court is of the firm view that he does not deserve anticipatory bail. Hence, this Court is not inclined to gra nt anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 07-04-2026 dk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.8553 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The Judicial Magistrate – II, Salem. 2. The Sub - Inspector of Police, Kitchipalayam Police Station, Salem District. 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.8553 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. dk CRL OP No. 8553 of 2026 07-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis