WP/11588/2026 of D.JAYACHANDRABABU Vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP No. 11588 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 11588 of 2026 D.Jayachandrababu ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tiruvallur district, Tiruvallur 2. The sub collector Ponneri, Tiruvallur district, Tiruvallur 3. The Tahsildar Gumidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur district 4. The Surveyor Gumidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur district 5. The village Administrative officer (VAO) Mukkarambakkam Village, Gumidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur district 6. K.Balaji ..Respondent(s) directing the 3rd respondents to consider petitioners representation dated 23/12/2025 seeking for rectification of boundaries in the FMB Sketch for Survey nos. S.No. 641/1A2, S.No. 640/1B2, S.No. 641/1B, S.No. 643/1B, S.No. 643/2B having an extetnt of Hect 0- 55.50 Ares in the Mukkarambakkam Village, Gumidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur district. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11588 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Lokesh Raj For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader for R1 to 5 Notice dispensed with for R6 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to rectify the alleged error in the FMB sketch for the property, morefully desc ribed in the prayer to this writ petition, within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2.According to the petitioner, there is an error in the FMB sketch for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner seeks for rectification of the same. The petitioner had given a representation to the third respondent on 23.12.2025 requesting the third respondent to correct the FMB sketch. Since the same has not been considered till date, the peti tioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 5. Since no adverse order is being passed against the sixth respondent, notice to the sixth respondent is dispensed with by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11588 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in a ccordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the sixth respondent and any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire, wit hin a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by direct ing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordanc e with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 23.12.2025 seeking for rectificat ion of the boundaries in the FMB sketch for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the sixth respondent and any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 07-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VGA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11588 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA To 1. The District Collector Tiruvallur district, Tiruvallur 2. The sub collector Ponneri, Tiruvallur district, Tiruvallur 3. The Tahsildar Gumidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur district 4. the Surveyor Gumidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur district 5. The village Administrative officer (VAO) Mukkarambakkam Village, Gumidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur district WP No. 11588 of 2026 07-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis