WP Crl./463/2026 of Saridha Vs The Director General of Police,
W.P.Crl.No.463 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.04.2026
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
W.P.Crl.No.463 of 2026
Saridha .. Petitioner
Versus
1. The Director General of Police,
No.601, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,
Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.
2. The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai City Police,
Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.
3. R.Suresh .. Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider
the petitioner’s representation, dated 27.03.2025 take necessary action
against the 3rd respondent in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Anandaraj
For Respondents : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam,
Additional Public Prosecutor,
for RR-1 and 2
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.463 of 2026
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking for a direction to the
respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the petitioner’s representation, dated
27.03.2026 and to take necessary action against the third respondent in
accordance with law.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that she sent a complaint on
27.03.2025 to the respondent Police making specific allegations against the
third respondent that the third respondent had informed that he was
unmarried and promised to marry the petitioner. Since, both start ed living
together as husband and wife. She also became pregnant and later, on
coming to know about the same, the third respondent started avoiding the
petitioner. He had also taken money from the petitioner on various dates
totalling to Rs.4,00,000/-. Now, the said Suresh is unable to be reached
and the money has also not been paid. She also came to know that the
third respondent had married to another girl and living with his w ife in the
Police Quarters, Pattinapakkam. When the petitioner questioned the thi rd
respondent, he threatened her and chased her away. Hence, the compla int
is lodged, but, no action has been taken. In support of her contention, t he
petitioner also produced some photographs showing that she married the
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.463 of 2026
third respondent.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the
complaint of the petitioner was received by the post on 27.03.2025.
Thereafter, followed by another complaint on 13.12.2025, an enquiry was
conducted by the Inspector of Police (Crimes), Adambakkam Police
Station and a notice was sent to the petitioner in the address give n. Three
notices were sent on 19.01.2026, 16.01.2026 and 21.01.2026. Despite the
same, she had failed to appear and participated in the enquiry. Hence, in
the enquiry, the statement of the third respondent was recorded.
4. It is seen that the petitioner has been making false claim as she
was deceived and had a relationship with the third respondent. Further, the
third respondent had denied about receipt of any money from the petitioner
and the petitioner, being friendly with the him, later, taking a dvantage of
the same, had been making unreasonable demand which was resisted and
thereafter, false complaints have been lodged. Recording the same, the
enquiry officer had closed the enquiry.
3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.463 of 2026
5. In view of the above, this Court finds that the petitioner, after
the complaint, had not participated in the enquiry and now, filed this
petition as no action has been taken. Recording the same, this Writ
Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
08.04.2026
Index : yes/no
Speaking order/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation : yes/no
grs
To
1. The Director General of Police,
No.601, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,
Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.
2. The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai City Police,
Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras.
4/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.463 of 2026
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
grs
W.P.Crl.No.463 of 2026
08.04.2026
5/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis