WP/11538/2026 of M.RAJAKUMAR Vs The Sub Collector

WP No. 11538 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 11538 of 2026 and WMP No.12581 of 2026 M.Rajakumar S/o.Muthuraj, Kakayan Street, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District-636 458 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Sub Collector Office of Sub Collector Mettur Dam, Mettur, Salem District. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Office of Revenue Divisional officer, Mettur, Salem District. 3. The Tasildhar, Taluk office mettur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 4. Kandan S/o.Kandasamy, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 5. Thoongan s/o.Kandasamy, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 6. Pachiammal w/o.Vellappan, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11538 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 7. Govindhan S/o.Vellappan, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 8. Murugesan s/o.Palanimuthu, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 9. Madhu S/o.Vellappan, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 10.Pappa D/o.Karupanan, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India f or the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2 nd respondents herein to dispose off the petitioner’s representation dated 09.05.2025 within time bound by considering the recommendations of the revenue officials and issue fre sh patta to the petitioner and pass orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Chandrasekaran V.Bhuvaneshwari N.Manikanda Jayakumar E.Dhamodaran M.Vignesh For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate for 1 to 3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11538 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 respondents 1 and 2 to delete the names of the private respondents viz ., the respondents 4 to 10 in the joint patta for the more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition. 2. The petitioner claims that erroneously the names of the private respondents 4 to 10 have been included in the joint patta for the prope rty more fully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the writ peti tion. According to the petitioner, he is the absolute owner of the said property and t herefore, the names of the private respondents viz., respondents 4 to 10 ought to be rem oved from the patta. The petitioner had submitted a representation on 09.05.2024 to the respondents 1 and 2, requesting them to delete the names of the pr ivate respondents 4 to 10 from the patta. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed a gainst the respondents 4 to 10, notice to them is dispensed with. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated above, is directed to be disposed of by the respondents, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of respondents 4 to 10 and all other necessary parties, whom the 2 nd respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11538 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 deems fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s application dated 09.05.2024. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2 nd respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 09.05.2024, seeking for deletion of the names of the respondents 4 to 10 from the patta, as more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of respondent s 4 to 10 and any other third party, whom the 2 nd respondent deems fit to enquire, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11538 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The Sub Collector office of Sub Collector Mettur Dam, Mettur, Salem District. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer office of Revenue Divisional officer, Mettur, Salem District. 3. The Tasildhar, Taluk office Mettur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11538 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKA WP No. 11538 of 2026 02-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis