CRL OP/9379/2026 of CH. Sidheeswaran Vs The State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP No. 9379 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9379 of 2026 CH. Sidheeswaran S/o.Haribaskar, 37/16, Sheshachalam Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police, S-3, Meenambakkam Police Station, Chennai- 600 027. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of apprehension of arrest in connection with Crime No. 83 of 2025 on the file of Inspector of Polic e, 8-3, Meenambakkam Police Station. For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.N.Kasi Vishwanathan For Respondent(s): MR.P.DHILEEPAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c), 22(c), 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Crime No.83 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks antici patory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9379 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that 1.30 grams of LSD, a commercial quantity, was recovered from the petitioner at the scene of occurrence. Hence, the case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner i s an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case by t he respondent police. He further submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition and that there are two accused and the present petitioner is A1. He further submitted that at the relevant time, the petitioner was at his residence, which can be substantiated through CDR and CCTV footage. Hence he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution’s case and, on instructions, submitted that the case involves offences under the NDPS Act and t hat the petitioner has one previous case in his credit. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Admittedly, this is a case of commercial quantity involving 1.30 grams of LSD stamps and that the petitioner has one previous case, this Court is not https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9379 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 inclined to go into the defence based on CDR and CCTV footage at this stage, as the same is premature. In view of the above and the petitioner ’s antecedents, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner is not entitle d for anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 16-04-2026 DRL To 1. The Inspector of Police, S-3, Meenambakkam Police Station, Chennai- 600 027. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9379 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 9379 of 2026 16-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis