WP/13266/2026 of GAYATHIRI CONSTRUCTION Vs Assistant Commissioner

__________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN W.P.No.13266 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.14515 & 14518 of 2026 Gayathiri Construction, Represented by its Partner, T. Selvi 1, Market Lane 3rd Floor, Chennai, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu - 600 019. ..Petitioner Vs Assistant Commissioner, Thiruvottiyur, Avadi, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of Orde r of Assessment in DRC-07 bearing Reference: ZD331225330778B in GSTIN/ID: 33AAHFG5993R1ZJ / APR 2021 - MAR 2022 dated 22.12.2025 passed by the respondent and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.Shivani .P For Respondent : Mrs.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate. ORDER Mrs.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the Respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page2 of 6 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission i tself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent. 3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 22.12.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 26.09.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appe ar for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 22.12.2025. 4. The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders on 07.11.2025, 02.12.2025 and 18.12.2025, which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. The Petitioner however neither fil ed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing fixed on 12.11.2025, 05.12.2025 and 19.12.2025. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed. 5. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has alr eady expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 16.03.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page3 of 6 6. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 10% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication. 7. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- “Petitioner agree to pay 10%” 8. Recording the above submission, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 9. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 26.09.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 22.12.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 26.09.2025. 10. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in acc ordance with https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page4 of 6 law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of thr ee (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated. 11. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subjec t to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other ta x period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order. 12. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipul ations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to rec over the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. 13. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. 14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 08.04.2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No kmm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page5 of 6 To Assistant Commissioner, Thiruvottiyur, Avadi, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page6 of 6 C.SARAVANAN, J. kmm W.P.No.13266 of 2026 08.04.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis