WP/12761/2026 of Venkatesh Vs The Deputy Commissioner (GST) (Appeal)
__________
Page1 of 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
WP Nos. 12761 & 12765 of 2026
and
WMP Nos. 13962, 13964, 13966 of 2026
Venkatesh
Sole Proprietor of N.S.K Blue Metals
No.8 /2, Kizh Pootheri Road, Nalmukkal Village
Kizhsiviri Post, Marakkanam TK,
Villupuram, Tamil Nadu-604 301. ..Petitioner in both WPs
Vs
1. The Deputy Commissioner (GST) (Appeal)
Commercial Tax Officer, Integrated Commercial Taxes Buildings
Villupuram District Collectorate, Master Plan Complex
Villupuram- 605 602.
2. The State Tax Officer
Tindivanam Assessment Circle
Circle Villupuram Zone, Cuddalore Division
Villupuram ....Respondents in both WPs
W.P.No.12761 of 2026: Writ Petition is filed under Art.226 of the Constitution
of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for t he records
leading to the issuance of appellate order bearing reference No.
ZD3307251992543, dated 19.07.2025 passed by the First Respondent and quash
the same.
WP No. 12765 of 2026: Writ Petition is filed under Art.226 of the Constitution
of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records leading
to the issuance of assessment order bearing GSTIN 33ADLPV0488P1ZP /
2020-21, dated 18.01.2025 passed by the Second Respondent and quash the
same.
For Petitioner in both WPs : Ms.B.Chandrika
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
__________
Page2 of 6
For Respondents in both WPs : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala,
Govt. Advocate
COMMON ORDER
With the consent of both the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and
learned Government Advocate for the Respondents, these Writ Petitions have
been disposed of.
2. In W.P.No.12765 of 2026, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned
Assessment Order dated 18.01.2025 whereby the proposal in Show Cause
Notice in DRC 01 dated 23.11.2024 for the tax period April 2020-2021 has
been confirmed in the absence of a reply despite three separate reminders to the
Petitioner by the 2nd Respondent.
3. In WP.No.12761 of 2026, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned
order dated 19.07.2025 passed by the 1 st Respondent whereby the Petitioner’s
appeal against the order dated 18.01.2025 impugned in WP.No.12765 of 2026
was dismissed on account of limitation as the said appeal was filed on
08.07.2025 beyond the statutory period of limitation.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing
to deposit 15% of the disputed tax over and above 10% already deposited a t the
time of filing of appeal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
__________
Page3 of 6
5. Learned Government Advocate for the Respondent has no objection for
remitting the case back to the 2nd Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits in
view of the order dated 18.01.2025.
6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made the followi ng
endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted
hereunder:-
“The Petitioner is willing to deposit balance 15% of the disputed ta x
demand “
7. Recording the above consent given by the Petitioner, the case is
remitted back to the 2nd Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the
Petitioner depositing additional 15% of the disputed tax in cash or f rom the
Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show
Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 23.11.2024 together with requisite
documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Assessment Or der
dated 18.01.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 23.11.2024.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
__________
Page4 of 6
9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the 2 nd
Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in acc ordance with
law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of thr ee (3) months
of such pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above
stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall
also stand automatically vacated.
10. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subje ct to the
Petitioner depositing additional 15% of the disputed tax as ordered above and
the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period
barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.
11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipul ations, the
2nd Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in
accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the 2 nd Respondent
shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
13. Any amount recovered or already paid by the Petitioner shall be
adjusted towards the disputed tax.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
__________
Page5 of 6
14. In the result, .WP.No.12765 of 2026 stands disposed of with the
above observations and WP.No.12761 of 2026 is dismissed. No costs.
Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
02-04-2026
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
GV
To
1. The Deputy Commissioner (GST) (Appeal)
Commercial Tax Officer, Integrated Commercial Taxes Buildings
Villupuram District Collectorate, Master Plan Complex
Villupuram- 605 602.
2. The State Tax Officer
Tindivanam Assessment Circle
Circle Villupuram Zone, Cuddalore Division
Villupuram
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
__________
Page6 of 6
C.SARAVANAN J.
GV
WP Nos. 12761 & 12765 of 2026
&
WMP NOs. 13962, 13964, 13966 of 2026
02-04-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis