LexDraft · Judgments

WP/13542/2026 of B.VIJAYA Vs The Secretary to Government

Madras High Court · 2026

Coram: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN

W.P.No.13542 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.13542 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.14805 of 2026 B.Vijaya W/o.Balajothikannan, No.6, Anandha Muthumariamman Koil Street, Kuyavarpalayam, Pudupalayam Revenue Village, Puducherry-605 013. Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary to Government Town and Country Planning-Cum-Chairman, Puducherry Planning Authority, Chief Secretariat, Goubert Avenue, Puducherry-605 001, India. 2.The Member Secretary Town and Country Planning Board, Government of Puducherry. 3.The Member Secretary Puducherry Planning Authority, Jawahar Nagar, Boomianpet, Puducherry. Respondents ______________ Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13542 of 2026 PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of In dia seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2 nd respondent to consider and dispose the appeal dated 05.06.2025 f iled by the petitioner under section 47 (1) of the Pondicherry To wn and Country Planning Act, within time frame fixed by this Hon’ble High Court and further forbear the proceedings of 3rd respondent’s notice for violation and stopping of construction dated 19.05.202 5 and Refusal Cum Demolition notice dated 27.05.2025 issued by the 3r d respondent, till disposal of the appeal by the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Arumugavel For Respondents: Mr.V.Vasanthakumar Addl. GP (Puducherry) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on admission. 2. This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Cons titution of India seeks a direction to the second respondent to c onsider and dispose of the appeal dated 5.6.2025 filed by the petit ioner under Section 47(1) of the Pondicherry Town and Country Planning Act. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that she is the owne r of the property situated at Pudupalayam Revenue Village in R.S.N o.39/5(P) ______________ Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13542 of 2026 and R.S.No.39/2(P), Cadaster No.282 part and 283 B part, T.S.No.115, Ward-G, Block No.6, Patta No.1429 measuring east-west 3 .2 meters on the northern side and 2.4 meters on the southern side; south-north 20.6 meters having a total extent of 624 sq. ft. Wit h an intention to construct a single-storied residential building, the petitioner has applied for building plan approval before the competent authority and paid scrutiny fee for the same. While the said application was pending consideration, the third respondent issued a stop work notice under Section 45(1) of the Puducherry Town and Country Planning Act, followed by a refusal-cum-demolition notice dated 27.5.202 5 alleging non-compliance with minimum frontage requirement and also deviations between the plan and the site conditions. The petitioner has submitted explanation/reply to the said notice, howeve r, without considering the explanation, the third respondent procee ded to reject the application. Aggrieved by the refusal of the application, the petitioner has filed a statutory appeal on 5.6.2025, which is still pending. Hence, the present writ petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, by producing a written communication dated 13.4.2026 received from t he Member Secretary, Puducherry Planning Authority, submitted tha t ownership ______________ Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13542 of 2026 dispute is pending consideration between the petitioner and the private party in O.S.No.29 of 2025 on the file of the III Addit ional District Munsif Court, Puducherry. He would submit that the ap peal of the petitioner shall be decided, in accordance with law, as e xpeditiously as possible. 5. In the light of the statement made by learned couns el for the respondents and the fact that the appeal of the pet itioner is pending since 5.6.2025, the second respondent is directed to decide the appeal and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon, as e xpeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed o f. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connec ted miscellaneous petition is closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 15.04.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr ______________ Page 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13542 of 2026 To: 1.The Secretary to Government Town and Country Planning-Cum-Chairman, Puducherry Planning Authority, Chief Secretariat, Goubert Avenue, Puducherry-605 001, India. 2.The Member Secretary Town and Country Planning Board, Government of Puducherry. 3.The Member Secretary Puducherry Planning Authority, Jawahar Nagar, Boomianpet, Puducherry. ______________ Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13542 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. bbr W.P.No.13542 of 2026 15.04.2026 ______________ Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis