CRP/1998/2026 of Moti and Company Vs Prasanchand Golecha,
CRP No. 1998 of 2026
__________
Page1 of 5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
CRP No. 1998 of 2026
AND
CMP NO. 8909 OF 2026
1. Moti and Company
A Partnership Firm,
Represented by its Partner,
Shantichand Golecha,
Carrying on business at
No.6, Appakannu Mudali Street,
Royapettah, Chennai -600 014.
2. Shantichand Golecha,
Son of late Motichand Dolecha,
Partner, M/s.Moti and Company,
No.6, Appakannu Mudali Street,
Royapettah, Chennai -600 014.
3. Ritu Golecha,
W/o.Sanjay Golecha,
Partner, M/s.Moti and Company,
No.6, Appakannu Mudali Street,
Royapettah, Chennai -600 014.
4. Sanjay Golecha,
S/o.Late Motichand Golecha,
Old No.190, New No.396,
Avvai Shanmugam Road,
Chennai -600 086.
Munna Kavar Golecha (Died)
5. Sharmila Bafna,
D/o.Late Motichand Golecha,
Maharani Mansion,
D Block, Road No.2, 36,
C.M.Area, Jamshedpur -831 001.
..Petitioner(s)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No. 1998 of 2026
__________
Page2 of 5
Vs
Prasanchand Golecha,
Old No.190, New No.396,
Avvai Shanmugam Road,
Chennai -600 086.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER
Civil Revision Petition filed under Art. 227 of Constitution of India,
praying to set aside the impugned order dated 13.03.2026 passed by the learned
Principal Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai, in I.A.No.4 of 2026 in
C.O.S.No.122 of 2024.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Ramesh Kumar
ORDER
Aggrieved over the impugned order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2026 in
C.O.S.No.122 of 2024 by the Principal Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai,,
the Revision Petitioners/defendants preferred this Civil Revision Petition.
2. Since the relief is claimed challenging the order passed by the Principal
Commercial Court, Chennai, notice to the respondent is dispensed with.
3. Before the trial court, the Revision Petitioners have filed an application
in I.A.No.4 of 2026 under Order IX Rule 7 of C.P.C. to set aside the ex parte
order passed against them dated 24.02.2026 immediately after the said orde r,
but the trial judge held that they have not cross-examined P.W.1 though
sufficient opportunity was given to them and the case was posted f or judgment.
Therefore, the trial judge was not inclined to allow the application.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No. 1998 of 2026
__________
Page3 of 5
3.The learned counsel for revision petitioners pointed out that already
there was a joint memorandum of compromise entered between the par ties in
C.S.No.472 of 2015 and they are having valid case. If opportunity is not give n
to them, their valuable right to defend the case would be defeated, since the
present suit is older suit. Originally, it was filed before the Or iginal Side of this
court in C.S.No.104 of 2004, which was transferred and numbered as
C.O.S.No.122 of 2024. Therefore, all these years, the revision
petitioners/defendants are contesting the case and they are also rel atives. If
opportunity is not given, their valuable right to defend the case will be defeated.
Therefore, to set aside the exparte order, they have filed application
immediately and on that day, their counsel was engaged in other court and the
trial court is not inclined to hear the arguments of junior counsel, w ho had
appeared. Therefore, he prayed to set aside the order passed by the trial judge.
4. Considering his submissions as well as considering the facts and
circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to set aside the findings
rendered in I.A.No.4 of 2026 in C.O.S.No.122 of 2024 by the Principal
Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai and to allow the I.A.No. 4 of 2026. The
revision petitioners are directed to co-operate with the tria l proceedings. The
trial judge is directed to give an opportunity to both parties and on hearing both
sides, the trial judge is directed to proceed with the matter and dispose of the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No. 1998 of 2026
__________
Page4 of 5
case in the manner known to law. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Pet ition is
allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is
closed.
07-04-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
RPP
To
The Principal Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP No. 1998 of 2026
__________
Page5 of 5
T.V.THAMILSELVI J.
RPP
CRP No. 1998 of 2026
AND
CMP NO. 8909 OF 2026
07-04-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis