WP/12829/2026 of M/S.ANUSH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD., Vs The Inspector General of Registration,

WP No. 12829 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 12829 of 2026 M/s.Anush Infrastructure Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Director Mr.M.Sukumar Reddy, Having office at No.908 B, Radiance shine Apartments, Old Mahabalipuram road, kazhipattur, chennai - 603 103. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, santhome high road, R.A.Puram, chennai - 600 028. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, 49/1A, GST Road, Alagesan Nagar, J C K Nagar, chengalpattu, Ammanambakkam, Tamilnadu - 603001. 3. The District Registrar, chengalpet District, Chengalpet - 603 001. 4. K.S.Subramaniyam 5. K.Muthukumar ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to dispose the petitioner’s representation dated 05.12.2025 in relation to cancellation of entries made in the encumbrance certificate da ted 13.11.2025 at the instructions of the first respondent by Sub-Registrar, Tiruporur, wher e the first respondent given findings as if a) The power of attorney executed by https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12829 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 S.Kandaswamy in favour of Mr.M.Sukumar Reddy on 01.02.2005 and regd. as Doc. No.86/2005 to an extent of 6 acres not valid; b) Another power of at torney executed by S.Kandaswamy in favour Mr.Sukumar Reddy on 02.02.2005 and regd. As Doc. No.96/2005 to an extent of 2.18 cents not valid; and c) Sal e deed executed by Mr.M.Sukumar Reddy as a power agent in favour of M/s.Anush Infrastructure Pvt Ltd on 23.03.2006 and regd. as Doc. No.2703/2006 to an extent of 26.71 cents declaring not valid which are the subject matt er of both suits in O.S.No.57/2022 and O.S.No.89/2023. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Subba Reddy For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Harish, GA for R1 to R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. According to the petitioner, arbitrarily, in the Encumbrance Certificate dat ed 13.11.2025 for the property morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, the following entries have been made by the first respondent: a) The power of attorney executed by S.Kandaswamy in favour of Mr.M.Sukumar Reddy on 01.02.2005 and regd. as Doc. No.86/2005 to an extent of 6 acres not valid; b) Another power of attorney executed by S.Kandaswamy in favour Mr.Sukumar Reddy on 02.02.2005 and regd. as Doc. No.96/2005 to an extent of 2.18 cents not valid; and c) Sale deed executed by Mr.M.Sukumar Reddy as a power https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12829 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 agent in favour of M/s.Anush Infrastructure Pvt Ltd on 23.03.2006 and regd. as Doc. No.2703/2006 to an extent of 26.71 cents declaring not valid which are the subject matter of both suits in O.S.No.57/2022 and O.S.No.89/2023. 2. According to the petitioner, they are the absolute owner of the pr operty morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition. According to them, without any notice to them, the above mentioned ent ries have been reflected in the Encumbrance Certificate dated 13.11.2025. In such circumstances, the petitioner had given a representation to the official respondents on 05.12.2025 requesting them to remove the aforesaid entries in the Encumbrance Certificate dated 13.11.2025. Since the said representat ion has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 and 5, notice to them in this writ petition is dispensed with by this Court. 4. No prejudice will be caused to the official respondents if the aforesaid representation of the petitioner is considered on merits and in ac cordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordi ngly, this writ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12829 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass fina l orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 05.12.2025 seeking for cancellation of entries morefully disclosed in the said representation of the petitioner, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, and after hearing the objections of all the necessary parties which includes the respondents 4 and 5, within a pe riod of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Cour t is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner. No Costs. 08-04-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To 1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, santhome high road, R.A.Puram, chennai - 600 028. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, 49/1A, GST Road, Alagesan Nagar, J C K Nagar, chengalpattu, Ammanambakkam, Tamilnadu - 603001. 3. The District Registrar, chengalpet District, Chengalpet - 603 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12829 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 12829 of 2026 08-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis