WP/13435/2026 of Manoj Kumar Nagappan Vs THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR

WP No. 13435 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 13435 of 2026 Manoj Kumar Nagappan ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Special Tahsildar Marasandiram, Hosur, Krishnagiri district ..Respondent(s) directing the respondent to consider and dispose of petitioners application dated 26.08.2022 bearing Application No. 70 for transfer of patt a and issuance of patta in respect of the properties situated in Survey No. 132, and Old Survey No. 105 New Survey No. 220/1 Chennasandram Taraff, Uliyala m Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri district within a stipulated time frame fixed by this Honble court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sanjay N Gandhi For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to t ransfer the patta for the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this w rit petition in the name of the petitioner, based on his application dated 26.08.2022 bearing Application No.70, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13435 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2.According to the petitioner, despite the aforesaid application submi tted with the respondent, till date, patta has not been transferred in his name. According to the petitioner, even though summons was issued to the petit ioner and survey was also conducted, no further steps have been taken by the respondent in respect of his application seeking for transfer of patta in his name. Only under those circumstances, this writ petition has been filed. 3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 4.The petitioner has filed supporting documents along with this writ petition in support of his application seeking for transfer of patta i n his favour for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the same. 5.No prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner’s application, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing all the necessary parties, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13435 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s application. 7.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by direct ing the respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance wit h law on the petitioner’s application dated 26.08.2022 bearing Application No.70 seeking for transfer of patta in his name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing all the necessary parties, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 16-04-2026 VGA To The Special Tahsildar Marasandiram, Hosur, Krishnagiri district https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13435 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA WP No. 13435 of 2026 16-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis