WP Crl./709/2026 of Yasotharani Vs The Inspector of Police,

WP Crl. No. 709 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR WP Crl. No. 709 of 2026 1. Yasotharani W/o. Ravichandran, No.474, Durairaj Nagar, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 2. Sri Akshaya D/o. Saravana Kumar, Minor Rep.by her, Mother Asotharani (1st Petitioner), No.474 Durairaj Nagar, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai East Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. 2. Praveen Kumar S/o. Ravichandran, No.474, Durairaj Nagar, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 709 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus for bearing the 1st Respondents from harassing the petitioner 1 and 2 on the false and frivolous complaint given by the 2nd Respondent. For Petitioner(s): D.Nandhagopal For Respondent(s): Mr. LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM ADDITIONAL PP ASSISTED BY Mr.HARSHANA. T FOR R1 Mr.B. JAWAHAR FOR R2 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to forebear the first responde nt from the harassing the petitioners on the false and frivolous complaint given by the second respondent. 2. The first petitioner herein is the mother of the second petitione r. The contention of the first petitioner is that the second respondent’s father had married the first petitioner and later the father of the second had committed aggravated sexual assault against the second petitioner, who is a minor. In this regard a complaint has been given by the first petitioner and a ca se in Crime No.18 of 2026 was registered and now the investigation is pending. At this stage, on the complaint of the second respondent a CSR in 192 of 2026 has been registered on false allegations as though the petitioner had committ ed theft, in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 709 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 order to withdraw the complaint given by the first petitioner against the father of the second respondent. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor had submitted that the second respondent had lodged a complaint on which CSR number has been assigned and produced the electronic receipt to show that the petitioner had entered the house and left the house with a bike and valuable documents ha ve been taken away by the first petitioner. 3. It is the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent that the complaint given by the second respondent has nothing to do with the complaint given by the first petitioner against his father and it is for his father to defend the case. It is his further contention that duri ng the enquiry the petitioner had undertook to hand over the articles and contrary to her undertaking, the petitioner had filed the present Writ Petition. 4. In view of the above submissions, the first petitioner shall appear before the first respondent police and participate in the enquiry and the first respondent shall complete enquiry in CSR.No.192 of 2026 within a period of four weeks from the receipt of a copy of this Order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 709 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition Criminal is disposed of. 06-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No vrc To 1. The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai East Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 709 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. vrc WP Crl. No. 709 of 2026 06-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis