WP Crl./753/2026 of Chinnasamy Vs The Superintendent of Police
WP Crl. No. 753 of 2026
__________
Page1 of 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
WP Crl. No. 753 of 2026
Chinnasamy
S/o.Muniyappan
No.2/82 Pallappatti Village
Nallampalli Taluk
Dharmapuri District
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
Dharmapuri District Dharmapuri
2. The Inspector of Police
Indur Police Station, Dharmapuri District
3. A.Chinnasamy
S/o.Angappan
Nathahalli Village Nallampalli Taluk
Dharmapuri District
..Respondent(s)
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of I ndia to
issue a Writ or Order Direction or any other appropriate Writ in a nature of a
WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the 2nd respondent to provide adequate
POLICE PROTECTION, based on the representation dated 20.01.2026 in
respect of the property comprised in Survey No.106/2A3, Measuring to an
extent of 880 square feet of land, situated at Nathahalli Village, Nallampalli
Taluk, Dharmapuri District for fencing the land.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran
For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 753 of 2026
__________
Page2 of 4
Additional
Public Prosecutor For R1 And R2
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the 2nd
respondent to provide adequate police protection, based on the representation
dated 20.01.2026 in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.106/2A3,
Measuring to an extent of 880 square feet of land, situated at Nathahalli Village,
Nallampalli Taluk, Dharmapuri District for fencing the land.
2. The petitioner had sent a representation on 20.01.2026 seeking police
protection to put up a fence on his property in Survey No.106/2A3 for 880 sq.ft.
Earlier the petitioner had approached this Court in W.P.No.31106 /2025 seeking
to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s land. Accor ding to
the petitioner, thereafter Survey was conducted and property was de marcated
and the Revenue Authorities had confirmed the petitioner’s right over the
property. Now, when the petitioner attempted to put up fencing, the adjacent
land owner who sold the property to the petitioner is making objec tions and the
petitioner is unable to fence his property. Hence, he seeks police protection.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the earlie r the
petitioner had approached this Court and obtained an order and the pro perty of
the petitioner was surveyed and it has been confirmed that the peti tioner is the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 753 of 2026
__________
Page3 of 4
owner of the property in Survey No.106/2A3. In view of the same, now the
respondent police can provide police protection.
4. On perusal of the materials it is seen that the third respondent is
objecting to putting up the fence in the petitioner’s land. The se cond respondent
shall inform the third respondent about the order of this Court. Unless t he third
respondent is able to produce any valid document or court order to show that the
petitioner has no such right to put up fence in Survey No.106/2A3, the sec ond
respondent shall give police protection to the petitioner to put up the fence in
Survey No.106/2A3 and the petitioner shall put up the fence within a per iod of
two weeks after the general election i.e. 23.04.2026.
5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed.
07-04-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
BKN
To
1. The Superintendent of Police
Dharmapuri District Dharmapuri
2. The Inspector of Police
Indur Police Station, Dharmapuri District
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 753 of 2026
__________
Page4 of 4
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
BKN
WP Crl. No. 753 of 2026
07-04-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis