WP Crl./827/2026 of R. Varadharaj Vs The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate/The Sub Collector

WP Crl. No. 827 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR WP Crl. No. 827 of 2026 and W.P.M.P.Crl.No.278 of 2026 R. Varadharaj S/o.Late. Ramasamy, D.No. 4/265, Dharmapuri Main Road, Rayakottai Village and Post, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District - 635 116. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate/The Sub Collector Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police o/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Inspector of Police Rayakottai District. Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of I ndia, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, praying to call for the records pertaining to impugned notice in V.No. 01/2026/B4 dt. 12.03.2026 issued by the respondent No.1 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): S.Ganeshkumar For Respondents- 1 to 3: Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 827 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioner had challenged the impugned notice dated 12.03.2026 directing the petitioner to appear on 17.03.2026 and execute a bond. 2.The contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the second respondent with an ulterior motive was creating records and foisting case against the petitioner. The petitioner not involved in any criminal case as alleged by the respondent police. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner is a History Sheeter with H.S.No.1/2026 and has got three previous cases. Further due to the impending general election, the petitioner was called to execute a bond on 17.03.2026 but he failed to appear. 4.The learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner will appear before the first respondent on 27.04.2026 and make his objections and in the meantime, he will also take steps to challenge H.S.No.1/2026 which according to the petitioner is a foisted case against him. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 827 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.In view of the same, the petitioner is directed to appear before the first respondent on 27.04.2026 and execute the bond. 6.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 16-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RSI To 1. The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate/The Sub Collector Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police o/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Inspector of Police Rayakottai District. Krishnagiri District. 4. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 827 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. RSI WP Crl. No. 827 of 2026 and W.P.M.P.Crl.No.278 of 2026 16-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis