WP/14246/2026 of PREETHI NANDA Vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Writ Petition No.14246 of 2026
__________
Page1 of 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Writ Petition No.14246 of 2026
Preethi Nanda
..Petitioner
Vs
1. State of Tamil Nadu
represented by its
Principal Secretary to the Government,
Department of Housing and Urban Development,
Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
Rep by its Member Secretary,
Egmore, Chennai-600008.
..Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing
the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated
25.02.2025, to withdraw the Madambakkam Land Pooling Area Development
Scheme.
For Petitioner :
For Respondents :
Mr.K.Harishankar
Ms.C.Meera Arumugam,
Additional Government Pleader [R1]
Mr.B.Sanjay Balachandar
Standing Counsel [R2]
*****
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to t he second
respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 25.02.2025, to
withdraw the Madambakkam Land Pooling Area Development Scheme.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.14246 of 2026
__________
Page2 of 4
2. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that even though
an objection was raised by the petitioner to the second respondent a s early as on
25.02.2025 requesting the second respondent to withdraw the Madambakkam
Land Pooling Area Development Scheme insofar as the petitioner’s la nds are
concerned, till date, the objection raised by the petitioner through his
representation dated 25.02.2025 has not been considered by the second
respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also drew the attention of thi s Court
to the Madambakkam Land Pooling Area Development Scheme and would
submit that only in accordance with the draft scheme, the petiti oner had given
the aforesaid representation dated 25.02.2025 objecting to the lands of the
petitioner being acquired. Learned counsel would also submit that the said
representation was given within the sixty (60) days deadline fixed under the
draft scheme.
4. Ms.C.Meera Arugmugam, learned Additional Government Pleader,
accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.B.Sanjay Balachandar,
learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the second respondent.
5. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's
representation dated 25.02.2025 raising objections as per the Madambakkam
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.14246 of 2026
__________
Page3 of 4
Land Pooling Area Development Scheme with regard to the acquisition of
petitioner's lands is considered by the second respondent on merits and in
accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is
not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representa tion dated
25.02.2025.
For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the
second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance w ith law on
the petitioner's representation dated 25.02.2025 objecting to acquisition of the
petitioner's lands under the Madambakkam Land Pooling Area Development
Scheme after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by
the petitioner within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order. No costs.
20-04-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
gm
To
1.The Principal Secretary to the Government,
Department of Housing and Urban Development,
Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Member Secretary,
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,
Egmore, Chennai-600008.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.14246 of 2026
__________
Page4 of 4
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
gm
Writ Petition No.14246 of 2026
20-04-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis