CRL OP/9143/2026 of Vijayakumar Vs State Rep.by, The Sub Inspector of Police,

CRL OP No. 9143 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9143 of 2026 1. Vijayakumar, S/o.Krishnan 2. Latha, W/o.Vijayakumar ..Petitioners Vs State Rep. By The Sub Inspector of Police, T-12 Poonamallee Police Station, (Crime No.167/2026) Thiruvallur District. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 t o enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.167/2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Ms.A.Jayanthi For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No. 103 of 2026 , on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9143 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners tried to hurt the de- facto complainant, who is the own sister of the 2nd petitioner. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner s submitted that the petitioner s were innocent and that they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that they are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and they are ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and fairly submits that the de- facto complainant has been discharged from the hospital on the same day. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 6. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advcaote, it is amply clear that there is no serious injury to the de-facto complainant and she has been discharged from the hospital on the same date and on the fact that the occurrence took place on 25.03.2026, therefore, at this length of time, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. Hence, this Court is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9143 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioner s are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the Learned Judicial Magistrate -II, Poonamallee, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner s fail to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (d) T he petitioner s shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one week; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9143 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. mp (e) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (f) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 10.04.2026 mp To 1. The Judicial Magistrate – II, Poonamallee 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, T-12 Poonamallee Police Station, Thiruvallur District. CRL OP No. 9143 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis