CRL OP/10078/2026 of Hariharan Vs The Commissioner of Police

CRL OP No.10078 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No.10078 of 2026 Hariharan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner of Police Office, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kilpauk Police Station, Chennai - 600 010. 3. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Chennai. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BN SS 2023, to direct the 1 st respondent herein to transfer investigation from the 2 nd respondent herein to CBCID Police, Chennai or to some other agency in Crime No.44 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Kilpauk, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.10078 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Ramesh For Respondent(s): Mr. LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM ADDITIONAL PP FOR R1 & R2 ORDER The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 1 st respondent to transfer the investigation from the 2nd respondent to the CBCID Police, Chennai, or to any other agency, in Crime No. 44 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Kilpauk, Chennai. 2. The petitioner is the father of one Hari Prasath, a 16-year-old boy, who allegedly died due to surgical complications arising from a procedure conducted by Dr. Ranjith Singh at Murugan Multi-Speciality Hospital, Kilpauk, Chennai. Prior to the surgery, the petitioner had reconfirmed with the said doctor regarding the seriousness and possible complications of the operation. The sa id Dr. Ranjith Singh had assured that the heart valve replacement surge ry was not complicated and could be performed without any health risk. Relying on the said assurance, the petitioner consented to the operation. It is sta ted that the surgery was conducted on 01.03.2026, and thereafter, the petitioner’s son remained unconscious until 04.03.2026, on which date he passed away. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.10078 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Suspecting that the death was due to medical negligence, the petit ioner lodged a complaint. Though an FIR was registered, it is alleged that the police have not conducted a proper investigation. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that immediatel y after the registration of the FIR, the police visited the hospital, took custody of the body, and conducted an inquest in the presence of panchayatdars. Thereafter, the body was sent to Kilpauk Medical College Hospital, where a post-mortem was conducted. The Post-Mortem Report in P.M. No. 592 of 2026 has been collected. It is further submitted that the FIR, case history, educational qualifications of Dr. Ranjith Singh, death report issued by Murugan Hos pital, and the post-mortem certificate have been forwarded along with a questionnaire to the Director of Medical Services, Kilpauk, Chennai. Upon receipt of the expert opinion, further investigation will be conducted in accordance w ith the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab, reported in AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3180, concerning cases of medical negligence. 4. Today, the post-mortem certificate has been handed over to the l earned counsel for the petitioner. Considering that the investigation is, as on date, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.10078 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. proceeding in the proper direction, and in view of the submissions made, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the same. 5. Recording the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 21.04.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKP To 1. The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner of Police Office, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kilpauk Police Station, Chennai - 600 010. 3.The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Chennai. 4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Madras. CRL OP No.10078 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis