CRL OP/10462/2026 of V.Saravanan Vs Deputy Superintendent of Police

CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 1. V.Saravanan 2. Anjalai 3. V.Chandru 4. N.Muniyammal 5. N.Vijayakumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Deputy Superintendent of Police Uthiramerur, Kancheepuram District. 2. State rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police Salavakkam Police Station, Kancheepuram District. (Crime No.25/2026) 3. Yogalakshmi ..Respondent(s) To direct the Principal District Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram District to consider the bail application sympathetically and pass orders on the merits of the same day on the petitioners’ surrender in connection w ith Cr.No.25/2026 pending before the respondents police, and pass such other orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Panchatsaram For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Baskaran, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direct ion to the Principal District Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram District to consider the petitioners’ bail application sympathetically and pass orders on meri ts on the same day as their surrender in connection with Cr.No.25 of 2026 pending before the respondents police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. The defacto complainant belongs to Scheduled Caste community. The first petitioner and the defacto complainant were in love with e ach other and subsequently got married in a Temple on 26.12.2025 and lived a happy life . Subsequently, the first petitioner along with the other petitioners, w ho are her in-laws, allegedly assaulted the defacto complainant, drove her out of the matrimonial home, and also abused her by referring to her caste name. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petiti oners have been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. In view of the above factual position, there shall be a direction to the Principal District Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram to consider the petitioners' bail application, preferably on the same day of their surrender, in connection with Crime No.25 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent Police and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity to the victims under Section 15-A of the SC/ST (PoA) Act, 1989. The petitioners shall surrender before the jurisdictional Court concerned wit hin a period of fifteen days from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 27-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PVS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The Principal District Sessions Judge, Kanchipuram 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Uthiramerur, Kancheepuram District 3. The Inspector of Police Salavakkam Police Station, Kancheepuram District. (Crime No.25/2026) 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. PVS CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 27-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis