CRL OP/11041/2026 of Pavithran Vs The State Of Tamil Nadu,

CRL OP No. 11041 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP No. 11041 of 2026 S Pavithran ..Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented By, The Inspector of Police, T-11Thirunindravur Police Station, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu 602024. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS to gra nt anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused in the event of his arrest by the respondent in T-11 Thirunindravur Police Station, Cr.No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent pending investigation. For Petitioner: Mr.B. Kalaiarasan For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Govt Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 189(4) and 125 of BNS 2023 r/w 25(1-A) of Arms Act in Crime No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11041 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner and false implication in the case, seeks indulgence of this Court. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this court. 3. The case of the prosecution as put forth by the learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, is that when the respondent police was i n vehicle checkup on 12.03.2026, the petitioners and others followed the car bearing Registration No. TN 12 DA 4693 in two cars and when the respondent police intercepted, the petitioner and others were found to be in possession of deadly weapons and threatening the public. Hence, this case. He further su bmitted that this is the 2 nd bail application for anticipatory bail and the earlier applicat ion was dismissed on 26.03.2026. He further submitted that there is no change i n circumstances and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the lea rned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11041 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) to the ef fect that there is no change of circumstances in the present case and that the investigation is still pending, this Court is of the view that it is not appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 29-04-2026 SHL To: 1. The Inspector of Police, T-11Thirunindravur Police Station, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu 602004. 2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11041 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J. SHL CRL OP No. 11041 of 2026 29-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis