WP/17833/2021 of Evangelical Literature Service Vs The Dstrict Collector

WP No. 17833 of 2021 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 17833 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.19045 of 2021 Evangelical Literature Service New No.158, Old No.95A, Vepery High Road, Chennai- 600 007,Rep by its General Secretary. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Rajaji Salai, Fourth Floor, 62, Beach Road, George Town, Chennai-600 001. 2. Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvottiyur High Road, Near Apollo Hospital, Tondiarpet, Tondiarpet Taluk, Chennai- 600 081. 3. The Tahsildar No.3, Raja Muthisiah Salai, Purasawalkam, Chennai- 600 003. 4. Property Association of Baptist Churches Pvt.Ltd ABM Compound, Post Box No.4, Kavali – 524201, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its President. 5. The American Baptist Foreign Mission Society No.127, Pullapuram, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. Rep. by its Treasurer. 6. Amina Praveen.Z.H ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 17833 of 2021 __________ Page2 of 6 Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from granting patta in the name of the 6th respondent, till the dispute regarding the title to land at New N o.158 (Old No.95A), Vepery High Road, Vepery Chennai - 600 007, comprised in O.S.No.690, R.S.No.736 (Present R.S.Nos.736/1 Part, 736/2 Part, in block 19, Vepery Villlage, Purasaiwalkam Taluk, Chennai District measuring an extent of 6 Grounds 1800 Sq. Ft or thereabouts is decided by the Courts For Petitioner(s): Ms.T.Jayalakshmi for M/s.Paul And Paul For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for RR1 to 3 Notice served -RR4 & 5 – No appearance Mr.C.Vidhusan for R6 ORDER This writ petition is filed forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 f rom granting patta in the name of the sixth respondent till the dispute regarding the title to the land at New No.158 (Old No.95A), Vepery High Road, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007 comprised in O.S.No.690, R.S.No.736 (present R.S.Nos.736/1 part, 736/2 part, in block 19, Vepery Village, Purasaiwalkam Taluk, Chennai District measuring an extent of 6 grounds 1800 sq.ft. or thereabouts is decided by the Courts. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, an agreement dated 04.07.1978 was executed by the respondents 4 and 5 and the petitioner, in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 17833 of 2021 __________ Page3 of 6 which permission was granted to the petitioner to construct an office cum residential building in the said property out of their own funds. Accordi ngly, a sale agreement as well as a power of attorney dated 04.07.1978 was executed by the respondents 4 and 5 by appointing the petitioner as their agent in respect of the said property. Ever since, a construction was put up by the petit ioner in the said property. However, without issuing any notice or conducting any enquiry, the petitioner came to know that the sixth respondent has modified her name in the property tax assessment. 3. On enquiring about the same, the petitioner came to know that, the change has been effected, based on the representation made by the sixth respondent as if she had recently purchased the said property from the fifth respondent, who is not the owner of the property. Subsequently, the fifth respondent filed civil suits against the petitioner which are still pending before the Courts. Pending the said suits, the sixth respondent is trying to mutat e the revenue records in her favour. Hence, the petitioner made several representations before the respondents 1 to 3 to refrain the sixth respondent from granting patta in her favour until the suits attain finality. However, the same has not been considered. Hence, the present writ petition has be en filed seeking the aforesaid relief. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sixth res pondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 17833 of 2021 __________ Page4 of 6 has clandestinely transferred the EB connection, property and assessment of Chennai Metropolitan Water and Sewerage tax in her favour without issuing any notice to the petitioner which is per se unsustainable. When there are several civil litigations pending against the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 6, the sixth respondent is trying to alienate the petitioner’s property in her favour which is contrary to law. Hence, he prayed to pass appropriate orders. 5. The learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that since t here are civil litigations pending against the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 6, the petitioner’s representation will be considered subject to the outcome of the suits pending before the Courts. 6. The learned counsel for the sixth respondent has filed a counter affidavit stating that the fifth respondent has executed a sale agreement in favour of the sixth respondent. Ever since the sixth respondent is in possession and enjoyment of the subject property. However, the petitioner has no right or title over the subject property. 7. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondents 1 to 3 and 6 and perused the materials available on record. 8. Admittedly, there are civil litigations pending against the petitioner and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 17833 of 2021 __________ Page5 of 6 respondents 4 to 6. It is the main grievance of the petitioner that , the fifth respondent had clandestinely sold the subject property in favour of the si xth respondent and subsequently sixth respondent has also obtained EB connection, name change in the property tax records, without issuing any notice to the petitioner or conducting any enquiry. However, the sixth respondent claims that he is the owner of the property. Such being the case, this Court without going into the merits of the case directs the respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hea ring to the petitioner as well as the aggrieved persons if any and pass appropria te orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order on merits and in accordance with law. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. No costs. 16-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rap https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 17833 of 2021 __________ Page6 of 6 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. rap To 1. The District Collector Rajaji Salai, Fourth Floor, 62, Beach Road, George Town, Chennai-600 001. 2. Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvottiyur High Road, Near Apollo Hospital, Tondiarpet, Tondiarpet Taluk, Chennai- 600 081. 3. The Tahsildar No.3, Raja Muthiah Salai, Purasawalkam, Chennai- 600 003. 4. The President, Property Association of Baptist Churches Pvt.Ltd ABM Compound, Post Box No.4, Kavali-524201 Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Treasurer, The American Baptist Foreign Mission Society No.127, Pullapuram, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. WP No. 17833 of 2021 16-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis