WP/19923/2022 of N.Masilamani Vs The District Registrar
WP No. 19923 of 2022
__________
Page1 of 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P No. 19923 of 2022
and
WMP.No.19227 of 2022
1. N.Masilamani
S/o.Natesa Mudaliar, 65-B, Maniyaakaran
Veedhi, Attaiyampatti Village and Post,
Salem-637 501.
2. M.Gunasekharan
S/o.N.Masilamani, 65-B, Maniyaakaran
Veedhi, Attaiyampatti Village and Post,
Salem-637 501.
3. M.Kanagavel
S/o.N.Masilamani, 65-B, Maniyaakaran
Veedhi, Attaiyampatti Village and Post,
Salem-637 501.
4. Niranjana Devi
D/o.N.Masilamani, W/o.Karthikeyan, 65-B,
Maniyaakaran Veedhi, Attaiyampatti Village
and Post, Salem-637 501.
..Petitioners
Vs
1. The District Registrar
Namakkal,
Namakkal District.
2. The Sub Registrar
Mallasamudram,
Namakkal District.
..Respondents
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19923 of 2022
__________
Page2 of 6
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India see king for
issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to accept for
registration and to register the Sale Deed of the Petitioners 2 to 4 in favour of
the 1st Petitioner with respect to the properties of M.Maragathavalli since
deceased, being property acquired by her in Regd. Sale Deed dated 09.11.1989-
Document No. 1815/1989-SRO- Vadakancherry and under Regd. Exchange
Deed dated 03.11.1999-Document No. 1961/1999-SRO-Mallasamudram.
For Petitioners: Ms.R.S.Lakshmi Priya
for T.M.Hariharan
For Respondents: Mr.R.Harish
Government Advocate
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2 nd respondent
to accept for registration and to register the Sale Deed of the Petitioners 2 to 4 in
favour of the 1st Petitioner with respect to the properties of M.Mara gathavalli
since deceased, being property acquired by her in Regd. Sale Deed dated
09.11.1989-Document No. 1815/1989-SRO- Vadakancherry and under Regd.
Exchange Deed dated 03.11.1999-Document No. 1961/1999-SRO-
Mallasamudram.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19923 of 2022
__________
Page3 of 6
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the
petitioners are the co-owners of the subject property and the petit ioners 2 to 4
intend to convey their 3/4th share in favour of the 1 st petitioner and therefore
they executed the draft Sale Deed in favour of the 1 st petitioner and presented
the same before the 2 nd respondent. But the 2 nd respondent has rejected the same
stating that the sale cannot be registered as the portion of the pro perty in Kerala
had been purchased in violation of provisions of Section 19B of the Indian
Stamp Act as amended by the Tamil Nadu Act 43 of 1992. In this regard, the
petitioners made a representation to the 2 nd respondent on 13.06.2022 seeking
to accept the Sale Deed executed by the petitioners 2 to 3 in favour of the 1 st
petitioner and register the same. As the same did not evoke any res ponse, the
petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking for the aforesaid relief.
3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the 2 nd respondent
would submit that document is yet to be presented and if any document is
presented, appropriate orders will be passed after issuing notice to the
petitioners.
4. Heard both sides. Perused the records.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19923 of 2022
__________
Page4 of 6
5. In the case on hand, it appears that orally the 2 nd respondent might have
rejected the request of the petitioners for registering the Sale D eed presented by
them, without passing any orders. Hence the petitioners 2 and 3 are directed to
present the Sale Deed said to have executed by them in favour of the 1 st
petitioner and on such presentation being made, the 2 nd respondent is directed to
conduct enquiry and take decision with regard to the registration of the
aforesaid document. It is made clear that if any information is required from the
petitioners, the 2 nd respondent shall issue notice to them and thereafter take
decision on merits and in accordance with law, without any delay.
6. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently,
WMP.No.19227 of 2022 filed to permit the petitioners to present and prosec ute
a single Writ Petition is ordered subject to payment of separate Court fee.
09-04-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
arr
Note: Registry is directed to issue order copy after ensuring the payment of
Court fee as ordered by this Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19923 of 2022
__________
Page5 of 6
To
1. The District Registrar
Namakkal, Namakkal District.
2. The Sub Registrar
Mallasamudram, Namakkal District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19923 of 2022
__________
Page6 of 6
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
arr
W.P No. 19923 of 2022
09-04-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 19923 of 2022
__________
Page7 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis