CRL OP/21587/2023 of R.A.A.S.ARUN Vs V.VENKATESH @ VENKATESAN

CRL OP No. 21587 of 2023 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 21587 of 2023 and CRL MP Nos. 14918 and 14919 of 2023 R.A.A.S.Arun S/o. R.A.Asubashchandrian, Aisa Deer Park Apartment, 2nd Floor, No.108, Velacherry Main Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 002. ..Petitioner(s) Vs V.Venkatesh @ Venkatesan S/o. Vishvanathan, No.1/1, Mettu Street, Seeneerkuppam Village, Thiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records in STC.No.997 of 2022 on the file of Hon’ble Fast Track Court Magistrate Level at Poonamallee and quash the same a s against the petitioner For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.G.Senthilkumar for Mr.D.Senthil Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Saranraj O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the p roceedings in STC.No.997 of 2022 on the file of the Fast Track Court Magistrate Level, Poonamallee. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21587 of 2023 __________ Page2 of 5 2. The petitioner is the accused in the complaint lodged by the respondent for an offence under Section 138 of the Negot iable Instruments Act. The complaint was lodged by the respondent alleging t hat the petitioner had borrowed a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- from the respondent during January, 2022 to run his real estate business on condition to repay the said sum together with interest at the rate of 24% per annum a nd in order to repay the said amount, the accused issued cheques and when the same were presented for collection, they were dishonoured for the reason ‘Account closed’. After issuance of notice, a complaint was lodged by t he respondent against the petitioner under Negotiable Instruments Act an d the same has been taken cognizance by the trial Court on file in STC No.998 of 2022. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the alleged cheque was issued by the partnership firm, however, the respondent failed to implead the partnership firm and other partners as accused. In fact, the respondent failed to cause any notice against partnership firm and other partners of the said firm and therefore, the complaint is not maintainable and liable to be quashed. 4. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the re spondent would submit that though the petitioner issued the cheque in the name of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21587 of 2023 __________ Page3 of 5 partnership firm, the respondent did not know about the details of the partnership firm and other partners. The petitioner, wh o is the Managing Director of the partnership firm had signed the cheque, therefore the respondent initiated proceedings as against the petitioner and the complaint is very much maintainable, thereby pleaded to allow the present petition. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the documents placed on record. 6. Perusal of the records reveals that the cheque, issued by the partnership firm, viz., Aruna Timber Depot, in fact, was signed by the Partner / Authorised Signatory, however, the respondent did not cause any statutory notice to the partnership firm and other partners. Fu rther, in order to attract an offence under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, unless the partnership firm has committed the offence, as the princip al accused, the other accused would not be responsible and convicted as vicariously liable. The provisions of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instrument s Act, extends vicarious criminal liability to officers associated with the compan y or firm when one of the twin requirements of Section 141 of the Negot iable Instruments Act has been satisfied, then by deeming fiction, is made vicariously liable and punished. Therefore, the complaint itself is not maintainable. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21587 of 2023 __________ Page4 of 5 In view of the above, the entire proceedings initiated under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be sustaine d and liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the present Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in STC No.997 of 2022 on the file of the Fast Track Court Magistrate Level at Poonamallee is quashed. Conseque ntly, connected miscellaneous petition are closed. 21-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssd To Fast Track Court Magistrate Level at Poonamallee https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21587 of 2023 __________ Page5 of 5 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J. ssd CRL OP No. 21587 of 2023 21-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis