CRP/3865/2017 of ISBANTHIYAR BAIG MOSQUE Vs M.V. LAXMINARASIMMA SAH(DIED)

CRP No. 3865 of 2017 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU CRP No. 3865 of 2017 Isbanthiyar Baig Mosque Rep By Its Mutawalli, S. Nagore Meeran, S/o. Shamsudeen, Sheikpet Shavadi Street, Kancheepuram. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. M.V. Laxminarasimma Sah(Died) 2. Samundeeswari Bai 3. Seetharam Sah 4. Janakiram Sah 5. Sreenivasan Sah (Sole Respondent died. Respondents 2 to 5 brought on record as LRs of the deceased R-1 Viz. M.V.Laxminarasimma Sah vide court order dated.09/08/2023 made in CMP Nos.14853,14858 and 14860 of 2023 in CRP (NPD) No.3865 of 2017) 6. The Tamilnadu Wakf Board Rep by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai -1. (R-6 impleaded vide Court order dated 27/02/2024 made in CMP No.3400 of 2022 in CRPNo.3865 of 2017) ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3865 of 2017 __________ Page2 of 5 Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995, praying to set a side the judgement and decree dated 26.06.2008 and made Wakf OS.No.45/2006 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Wakf Tribunal, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.A.Nassir Hussain For Respondent(s): R1- Died Mr.J.Ram For Mr.M. Ramesh (For R2 To R5) Mr. Avinash Wadhwani (For R6) ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the judgem ent and decree dated 26.06.2008 and made Wakf OS.No.45 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Waqf Tribunal, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District. 2. Heard Mr.N.A.Nassir Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.J.Ram, representing Mr.M.Ramesh, learned counsel for respondents 2 to 5 and Mr.Avinash Wadhwani, learned counsel for the 6th respondent. 3.The present revision has been filed as against the judgment and decree made by the Waqf Tribunal as early as in the year 2008. A perusal of the plaint would indicate that the Waqf Board had not been made a party to the suit, which https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3865 of 2017 __________ Page3 of 5 is mandatory as per the provisions of Section 90 of the Waqf Act, 1995. A perusal of the judgment and decree does not also indicate that notice had been ordered by the Waqf Tribunal to the Waqf Board, as required under Sec tion 90 of the Waqf Act. 4. In such view of the matter, the judgment and decree passed is cont rary to the statutory mandates as required under the Waqf Act, 1995 and he nce, the judgment and decree could only be termed as non est in law. 5. Accordingly, the judgment and decree dated 26.06.2008 made in Wakf OS.No.45 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Waqf Tribunal, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District stands set aside and this Civil Revi sion Petition stands allowed. Liberty to initiate appropriate proceedi ngs on the cause of action, on which the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2006 had been filed is gra nted. No costs. 16-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3865 of 2017 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The learned Principal Sub Judge, Wakf Tribunal, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu Wakf Board No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai -1. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3865 of 2017 __________ Page5 of 5 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. kak CRP No. 3865 of 2017 16-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis