WP/34366/2019 of M.Abdul Razak @ Jalak, Vs The Tahsildar,
WP No. 34366 of 2019
__________
Page1 of 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
WP No. 34366 of 2019
M.Abdul Razak @ Jalak
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office, Thiruporur.
2. Revenue Divisional Officer,
Chengalpet.
3. The District Collector,
Chengalpet District
4. The Sub-Registrar,
Thiruporur, Kancheepuram District
5. Bothumiyan
6. Periya Basha
7. Mohamed Kassim
8. Mohammed Haniffa
9. Masthan Bi
10.Ramjanbi
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent herein to pass orders
on the representation of the petitioner dated 10.10.2019 for cancellation of patta
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 34366 of 2019
__________
Page2 of 4
in the name of the respondents 5 to 10 comprised in Survey Nos. 70/2A1B2,
70/2A1B3, 70/2A1B4, 70/2A1B5, 70/2A1B6, 70/2A1B7 measuring 0.29.6
acres out of 0.50.0 ares of land from Survey No.70/2A1B situated in Survey
No.70/2A1B situated Semmancherry Village, Thiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram
District belonging to the petitioner.
For Petitioner(s): Ms.A.S.Neela Narayani
For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ramanlal
Additional Advocate General – VII assisted by
Mr.C.Gauthamaraj
Government Advocate for R1 to R4
Mr.R.Dhanasekaran for R5, R8 to R10
R6 – Deceased (steps due)
R7 – Not ready in notice
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to consider
the petitioner’s representation dated 10.10.2019.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the
petitioner has given a representation dated 10.10.2019 for cancellation of patta
in the name of the respondents 5 to 10 comprised in Survey Nos. 70/2A1B2,
70/2A1B3, 70/2A1B4, 70/2A1B5, 70/2A1B6, 70/2A1B7 measuring 0.29.6
acres out of 0.50.0 ares of land from Survey No.70/2A1B situated in Survey
No.70/2A1B situated Semmancherry Village, Thiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram
District belonging to the petitioner.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 34366 of 2019
__________
Page3 of 4
3. In reply, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for t he
official respondents would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated
10.10.2019 will be disposed of by the respondents within a period of eight
weeks.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned c ounsel
appearing for the respondents and also perused the materials available on
record.
5. In view of the above, this Court directs the 1 st respondent to consider
the petitioner’s representation dated 10.10.2019 and pass appropriate orders on
the same, in accordance with law, within a period of eight wee ks from the date
of receipt of copy of this order, after due notice to the parties concerned.
6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
09-04-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
KKN
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 34366 of 2019
__________
Page4 of 4
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
KKN
To
1. The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office, Thiruporur.
2. Revenue Divisional Officer,
Chengalpet.
3. The District Collector,
Chengalpet District.
4. The Sub-Registrar,
Thiruporur, Kancheepuram District.
WP No. 34366 of 2019
09-04-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis