C.S(COMM DIV)/252/2025 of Spalon India Private Limited Vs Mrs Pooja Gupta Trading as B BOUNCE Salon
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 252 of 2025
__________
Page1 of 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.04.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 252 of 2025
and
O.A. Nos. 952 to 955 of 2025 and A. No.4819 of 2025
Spalon India Private Limited
Represented by its Authorized Representative
Ms Sneh Koticha 2nd Floor Saba House No 209
A St Mary s Road Alwarpet Chennai 600018
..Plaintiff
Vs
Mrs Pooja Gupta
Trading as, B BOUNCE Salon,
D-147, Near Geeta Bhawan,
Near HDFC Bank, Kamla Nagar,
Delhi-110007
..Defendant
Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure read
with Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules of The Madras High Court,
Section 2(1)(C)(xvii) read with Section 7 of The Commercial Courts Act,
2015 and Sections 27, 28, 29, 134 and 135 of The Trade Marks Act, 1999
praying to grant a judgment and decree on the following terms:
a) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their
partners, their employees, officers, servants, agents, and all others acting
for and on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, distributing,
exporting, advertising, offering for sale, any products, offering service and
in any other manner, directly or indirectly, online or offline, dealing with
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 252 of 2025
__________
Page2 of 6
any service in the name of “B BOUNCE SALON, B BOUNCE, B BOUNCE
UNISEX SALON
which is identical similar to the Plaintiff’s registered trademark BOUNCE
amounting to an infringement of the plaintiff’s registered trademarks
bearing the application nos.1278997 under class 42, 2371476 under class
44 2371477 under class 26, 2371478 under class 11, 2371479 under
class 21, 2375804 under class 41, 2375805 under class 44, 3381492
under class 44, 3381493 under class 44 and 5730239 under class 41 in
any manner whatsoever;
b) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their partners,
their employees, officers, servants, agents and all others acting for and
on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, distributing, exporting,
advertising, offering for sale, and in any other manner, directly or
indirectly, dealing with any products, services in the name of B BOUNCE
SALON, B BOUNCE, B BOUNCE UNISEX SALON
or any mark which is identical/similar to the plaintiff’s registered
trademarks BOUNCE and such other marks and passing off the
goods/services of the defendant as and for those of the plaintiff in any
manner whatsoever;
c) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their partners, their
employees, officers, servants, agents and all others acting for and on
their behalf from using mark B BOUNCE SALON, B BOUNCE, B BOUNCE
UNISEX SALON
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 252 of 2025
__________
Page3 of 6
or any mark which is deceptively similar and or identical to the Plaintiff’s
registered trademark “BOUNCE” in any of the websites, domain names,
social media platforms, email address, mobile application and other
intermediaries in any language in any manner whatsoever;
d) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their partners,
directors, proprietors, subsidiaries, affiliates, franchisees, officers,
servants, agents, distributors, stockists, representatives, licensees and
anyone acting for or on their behalf directly or indirectly, as the case may
be from performing any actions, especially using the trademarks “B
BOUNCE SALON, B BOUNCE, B BOUNCE UNISEX SALON
or any mark which is deceptively similar and or identical to the Plaintiff’s
trademark BOUNCE amounting to unfair competition, dilution of the
goodwill and reputation of the Plaintiff’s trademark or doing any other
thing which will lead to dilution of Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties;
e) The Defendants be ordered to pay the Plaintiff a sum of lNR
10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) as damages for having committed
infringement of the Plaintiff’s registered trademark and passing off in
respect of the Plaintiff’s trademark BOUNCE and its formative marks;
f) A preliminary decree be passed in favour of the Plaintiff directing
the Defendant to render true and proper accounts of the profits arising
out of the amount of sales generated by the defendant in respect of their
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 252 of 2025
__________
Page4 of 6
alleged activities bearing the mark “B BOUNCE SALON, B BOUNCE, B
BOUNCE UNISEX SALON
or any mark which is deceptively similar and
or identical to the Plaintiff’s registered trademark "BOUNCE” in any
manner whatsoever;
g) To grant order of delivery up of any brochures/ printed material
and/or any material bearing “B BOUNCE SALON, B BOUNCE, B BOUNCE
UNISEX SALON
which infringes Plaintiff’s registered trademark BOUNCE;
h) Costs of such other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, in
the circumstances of the case, in the interests of justice and equity.
For Plaintiff: Mr.V.S.Krishna
for Mr.M.S.Bharath
For Defendant: Mr.Shoaib Fazil
JUDGMENT
The suit was filed for the remedies in respect of alleged
infringement of trade mark and passing off. Pursuant to negotiations,
parties reached a settlement and executed a memorandum of
compromise dated 28.03.2026. Such memorandum of compromise has
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 252 of 2025
__________
Page5 of 6
been executed by an authorised signatory of the plaintiff and by the
defendant. The respective counsel have also signed the document.
2. In such memorandum of compromise, the defendant has
submitted to a decree in terms of remedies claimed in paragraph
Nos.60(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the plaint. The plaintiff has agreed to give
up remedies claimed in paragraph Nos.60(f) and (g) of the plaint. As
regards the remedy claimed in paragraph No.60(e) of the plaint, the
defendant has agreed to and paid a sum of Rs.30,000/- as costs. The
parties have also provided for payment of liquidated damages of
Rs.10,00,000/- in the event of breach.
3. I find no legal impediment to the issuance of decree in terms of
said memorandum of compromise.
4. Therefore, the civil suit is decreed in terms of memorandum of
compromise dated 28.03.2026, which shall form an integral part of such
decree. Consequently, connected applications are closed.
27.04.2026
Index: Yes/No
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
mmi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 252 of 2025
__________
Page6 of 6
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J.
mmi
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 252 of 2025
27.04.2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis