HCP/2059/2025 of SAMMANASUMARY Vs The Secretary to the Government

HCP No. 2059 of 2025 __________ Page 1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN HCP No. 2059 of 2025 Sammanasumary ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Secretary to the Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The District Magistrate and Collector of Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi 3. The Superintendent of Police Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi 4. The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Cuddalore 5. The Inspector of Police Thiyagadurgam Police Station, Kallakurichi District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 22.09.2025 in D.O.No.C2/26/2025 against the petitioner’s husband Susainathan, male aged 48 years S/o.Chinnappan, who is confined at Central Prison, Cuddalore and setaside the same and direct the respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP No. 2059 of 2025 __________ Page 2 of 5 to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Balaji For Respondent(s): Mr. R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor, Assisted By Mr. M.Sylvester John ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The wife of the detenu – Susainathan, aged 48 years, S/o.Chinnappan, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 22.09.2025, branding him as a ‘Drug Offender’ under Section 2(e) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982). 2. We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents. 3. The detention order is liable to be set aside on the sole ground that the translated copies of the Arrest Card and Arrest Intimation at Page Nos.19 to 21 in Volume – I, have not been furnished to the detenu. Admittedly the detenu is acquainted only with Tamil. It is we ll settled https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP No. 2059 of 2025 __________ Page 3 of 5 that if the document is not furnished in the language known to the detenu, his right to make effective representation would be denied. In 'Powanammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu' reported in '(1999) 2 SCC 413', the Hon’ble Supreme Court had held that non-supply of documents in the language known to the detenu renders the detenu’s detention illegal. 4.Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in Detention Order in D.O.No.C2/26/2025 dated 22.09.2025 is set aside. 5. The detenu, viz., Susainathan, aged 48 years, S/o.Chinnappan, now confined in Central Prison, Cuddalore, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his presence is required in connection with any othe r case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 28-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Note: Issue Order Today ars https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP No. 2059 of 2025 __________ Page 4 of 5 To 1. The Secretary to the Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The District Magistrate and Collector of Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi 3. The Superintendent of Police Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi 4. The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Cuddalore 5. The Inspector of Police Thiyagadurgam Police Station, Kallakurichi District. 6. The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai 7. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP No. 2059 of 2025 __________ Page 5 of 5 DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. ars HCP No. 2059 of 2025 28-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis