WP/41332/2025 of NARASIMMARAJAN Vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

2026:MHC:1469 WP No. 41332 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 41332 of 2025 Narasimmarajan S/o. Late P.R. Narasimman, Balaguri Village, Bellarampalli Post, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2. The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Krishnagiri Revenue Division, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 4. The Tahsildhar Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District, . 5. Elango S/o. Mr. Thimmarayan, Balaguri Village, Bellarmpalli Post, -635 122, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 6. Amutha D/o. Mr. Thimmarayan, Balaguri Village, Bellarmpalli Post, -635 122, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 7. Deepa W/o. Sivakumar, No.5/46, Mourunahalli Village, Doddathimmanahalli -635 116, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishangiri District. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 41332 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 5 To direct the Respondents 1 to 4 remove the encroachments made by the Respondents 5 to 7 in the Government Anatheenam land in S.No.293/2, situated at Ittaikal Agaram Revenue Village, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District based on the application of the petitioner dated 07. 03.2025 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to restore the said land as its original position WP No. 41332 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.R. Jothimanian For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 to R4 , Mr.T.Sundaravadanam for R5 to R7 Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachments made by the Respondents 5 to 7 in the Government Anatheenam land in S.No.293/2, situated at Itt aikal Agaram Revenue Village, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, based on the application of the petitioner dated 07.03.2025 and consequ ently, direct the respondents 1 to 4 to restore the said land as its original position. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents would state that during the course of survey, th e authorities have identified encroachments made in Government property. Thus, the competent authorities have decided to initiate enforcement action fo r removal of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 41332 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 5 encroachments by following the procedures. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the private respondents Nos.5 to 7 would oppose by stating that there is an order passed by the High Court in the second appeal and the private respondents are not encroach ers. The petitioner has set up a false case against the private respondents. 4. High Court cannot conduct adjudication in respect of dispu ted facts of civil nature which requires examination of documents by com petent authorities. Further, the respondents 5 to 7 claim title/ ownership in respect of the subject property, their remedy is before the Civil Cour t. If the respondents relied on the judgment of the High Court, the same may b e submitted before the competent authority for consideration. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that th e Second Appeal judgment is not connected with the subject propert y which has been encroached upon by 5 th to 7 th respondents. All these disputed facts are to be resolved by conducting enquiry by the competent authority a fter issuing show cause notice to the encroachers. It is also brought to the no tice of this Court that Section 7 notice has already been issued to the encroachers. 6. That being the factum, the noticees are at liberty to subject their explanations within the time line fixed by the authorities a nd thereafter, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 41332 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 5 authorities may consider the documents and pass final ord ers and proceed with the enforcement action for removal of encroachments, if any identified. Such exercise is directed to be completed within a period of twe lve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With these directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No vsi To 1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2. The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Krishnagiri Revenue Division, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 4. The Tahsildhar Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District, . https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 41332 of 2025 __________ Page5 of 5 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.SURENDER J. vsi WP No. 41332 of 2025 09-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis