Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/27/2026 of M/s.AnanyaKrishnaa Constructions Private limited, Vs R.Abhirami

Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 27 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 27 of 2026 M/s.AnanyaKrishnaa Constructions Private limited, Rep by its Managing Director, Mr.Y.Gangadhar, No.1225/1, Panneer Selvam Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 078. Presently at No.110, Ground and First Floors, Lakshmana Swamy Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 078. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. R.Abhirami 2. R Sruthi 3. J. Rukmani 4. J Rangarajan ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division) is file d under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, pleased to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent in terms of the Joint Development Agreement dated 11.03.2016. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 27 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Thiageswaran for M/s.Waron & Sai Rams ORDER Joint Development Agreement dated 11.03.2016 was executed by the petitioner and the respondent. Clause 33 thereof, which provides for di spute resolution by arbitration, is set out below: “33. The parties herein agree to settle all disputes, misunderstandings and difference of opinion that might be arising between them whether as to the interpretation of the terms and conditions, contained herein and / or as to the determination of their respective rights, by way of referring such dispute/s to the sole arbi trator to be appointed by the Party of the Second Part with the consent of the Party of the First Part. The procedure as prescribed by the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended up to date shall be adopted by the sole arbitrator / umpire as the case may be. The law applicable shall be Indian law and the venue of Arbitration shall be at Chennai. The Courts in Chennai alone shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction to try all consequential proceedings arising from the said award / arbitration proceedings.” 2. Invoking said clause upon disputes arising between the partie s, the petitioner issued notice dated 12.10.2022 under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Upon receipt thereof, by reply dated 05.11.2022, the respondent refused to consent to the person proposed by the petitioner and instead called upon the petitioner to nominate three persons so as t o enable the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 27 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 respondent to agree on the sole arbitrator. 3. Thus, parties agree that the joint development agreement pr ovides for dispute resolution through arbitration by a sole arbitrator. 4. In the above facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed by appointing Mr.M.K.Kabir, Senior Advocate, Mobile No.9840044258, as the sole arbitrator. Learned arbitrator is requested to enter upon reference and adjudicate the dispute. The fees and expenses of arbitration shal l be fixed by learned arbitrator in consultation with the parties. No costs. 16-04-2026 (4/5) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 27 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 27 of 2026 16-04-2026 (4/5) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis