WP/1038/2026 of V.PRABAHARAN Vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
WP No. 1038 of 2026
__________
Page1 of 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER
WP No. 1038 of 2026
V.Prabaharan
S/o.Veeramuthu,
Alagusamuthiram Village,
Steel Plant Post,
Salem District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector
Salem District.
2. The Revenue divisional officer
Mettur,Salem District.
3. The Tahsildar
Omalur Taluk, Salem District.
4. The Block Development Officer
Block Development Office,
Omalur , Salem District.
5. Chithayee
W/o.Govindhasamy,
Alagusamuthiram Village,
steel Plant Post,
Salem District.
6. Govindhasamy
S/o.Chithan,
Alagusamuthiram Village,
steel Plant Post,
Salem District.
..Respondent(s)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 1038 of 2026
__________
Page2 of 6
To direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action to remove the
encroachments made by the respondents 5 and 6 in S.F.No.112/ 10 and
112/ 13, classified as Government Promboke Land (Pathway) in
Alagusamuthiram village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District, by considering
petitioner representation dated 01.10.2019 and proceedings of the
respondents 1 to 4.
WP No. 1038 of 2026
For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Prabakar
For Respondent(s): Mr. T. Arun Kumar,
Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 to R3
Mr. J.C. Durairaj,
Addl.Govt.Pleader for R4
R5- not ready in notice
No appearance for R6
Order
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Writ of Mandamus has been instituted seeking to direct the
respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action to remove the encroachments
made by the respondents 5 and 6 in S.F.No.112/ 10 and 112/ 13, classified
as Government Promboke Land (Pathway) in Alagusamuthiram village,
Omalur Taluk, Salem District, by considering petitioner’s representation dated
01.10.2019 and proceedings of the respondents 1 to 4.
2. Learned Additional Government Pleader, based on the written
instruction given by the Tahsildar, Omalur, would submit that the revenue
authorities conducted survey and found that there is no encroachment in
S.F.No.112/10. However, the encroachers are identified in S.F.No.112/13,
which is classified as natham land. Learned Additional Government Pleader
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 1038 of 2026
__________
Page3 of 6
would further submit that enforcement actions will be initiated for removal of
encroachments.
3. That being the factum, the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to initiate
enforcement action for removal of encroachments by following the procedures
as contemplated under the relevant statues and rules by affording opportunity
to the alleged encroachers.
4. In respect of the grama natham lands, the revenue authorities are
empowered to invoke the provisions of the Tamilnadu Land Encroachments
Act, more specifically, under RSO 21 as well as RSO 26, which would provide
powers to the authorities to invoke the Tamilnadu Land Encroachments
Act,1905, for removal of encroachments. The said exercise is directed to be
completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of
this order.
5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
(S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.)
22-04-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
VSI
To
1. The District Collector
Salem District
2. The Revenue divisional officer
Mettur,Salem District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 1038 of 2026
__________
Page4 of 6
3. The Tahsildar
Omalur Taluk, Salem District.
4. The Block Development Officer
Block Development Office,
Omalur , Salem District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 1038 of 2026
__________
Page5 of 6
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.
AND
K.SURENDER J.
vsi
WP No. 1038 of 2026
22-04-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 1038 of 2026
__________
Page6 of 6
To
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis