CONT P/827/2026 of T.S.Saravanan Vs K.Rajagopal

CONT P No. 827 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CONT P No. 827 of 2026 and CONT P No. 835 of 2026 T.S.Saravanan S/o, Sundaram, D.No.20/2, Malaikavalor Kovil Street, Tiruchengode Town, Namakkal District - 211. ..Petitioner(s) Vs K.Rajagopal D.NO.9, Old Velur Road, Valaraigate, Karattupalayam at Muthuanampalayam, Tiruchengode Town and Taluk, Namakkal District - 209. ..Contemnor(s) CONT P No. 827 of 2026 To punish the respondent herein for committing contempt of the order of this high court dated 31.07.2025 in c.m.a.no. 2099 of 2025 CONT P No. 827 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): N.Jayakkumar, S. Sivasankar S.A. Mangai M. Sudha P. Bhuvanesh Memo Filed On Behalf Of The Petitioner Filed On 16.04.2026 For Contemnor(s): Vakalat Filed By M/s.Sudharshana Sundar, E.Balamurugan, V.Ramesh, D.Saravana Kumar, Counsel For The Respondent Filed On 08.04.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 827 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 CONT P No. 835 of 2026 T.S.Saravanan S/o. Sundaram, D.No.20/2, Malaikavalor Kovil Street, Tiruchengode Town, Namakkal District - 637 211. ..Petitioner(s) Vs K.Rajagopal D.No.9, Old Velur Road, Valaraigate, Karattupalayam @ Muthuanampalayam, Tiruchengode Town and Taluk, Namakkal District - 637 209. ..Contemnor(s) CONT P No. 835 of 2026 To punish the respondent herein for committing contempt of the order of this high court dated 31.07.2025 in C.M.A.No. 2098 of 2025 CONT P No. 835 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): N.Jayakkumar, S.Siva Sankar, S.A.Mangai, M.Sudha, P.Bhuvanesh For Contemnor(s): Vakalat Filed By M/s.Sudharshana Sundar, E.Balamurugan, V.Ramesh, D.Saravana Kumar, Counsel For The Respondent Filed On 08.04.2026 Common Order As per the earlier order of this Court, Shop Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 w ere allotted to the petitioner, and the remaining Shop Nos. 1, 2 and 7 to 10 were allotted to the respondents. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 827 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 2. When the matter was taken up, the petitioner submitted that the respondents are causing interference, due to which he is unable to l ease out the shops or induct new tenants. On the other hand, the learned counsel appeari ng for the respondents denied the said allegation and contended that the respondents have not caused any interference; instead, it is the petit ioner who is entering the backside portion of the property allotted to the responde nts and causing disturbance. 3. Thus, both parties have made allegations against each other. In order to avoid further complications, this Court is of the view that the revisi on petitioner may be permitted to install CCTV cameras in the portion all otted to him, for which the respondents have expressed no objection. 4. The respondents have also stated that they have no objection to the petitioner inducting new tenants in the portions allotted to him, subj ect to the outcome of the suit. 5. It is further observed that the portions allotted to the responde nts are situated on the backside, whereas the portions allotted to the peti tioner are on the front side. Therefore, both parties are directed not to inter fere with each other’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective portions. The petitioner shall not enter the backside portion allotted to the respondents. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 827 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. JRS 5. With the above observations, it is reiterated that the order pa ssed by this Court on 31.07.2025 shall be strictly followed by the parties in letter and spirit. In the result, these contempt petitions are closed. No costs. 17-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No JRS To K.Rajagopal D.NO.9, Old Velur Road, Valaraigate, Karattupalayam at Muthuanampalayam, Tiruchengode Town and Taluk, Namakkal District - 209. CONT P No. 827 of 2026 and CONT P No. 835 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis