CWP/8143/2023 of GANPAT AND ORS. Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP-8143-
IN TH
214
Ganpat and o
State of Hary
CORAM:
Present :
HARPREET
1.
of the Consti
or order in th
not regulariz
20.05.2015 (A
titled as Chh
Further prayi
the responde
with the resp
dated 02.06.2
1
-2023
N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA
AT CHANDIGA
Date of De
t and others
VERSUS
f Haryana and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA
Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchand
Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Har
Mr. Prateek Mahajan with Mr. K
respondents No.2 to 9.
****
REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
The present writ petition has be
Constitution of India with a prayer for
in the nature of certiorari for quashi
gularizing the services of p etitioner
015 (Annexure P-8) passed in CWP
Chhabi Lal and others Versus S
r praying for issuance of a writ in the
pondents to regularize the services o
e respondents for the last more than 13
02.06.2003 and 29.07.2011 (Annexur
NJAB AND HARYANA
DIGARH
CWP-8143-2023 (O&M)
of Decision: January 08, 2026
.....Petitioner
SUS
...Responden
E HARPREET SINGH BRAR
nchanda, Advocate for the petitioners
, Haryana.
Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocates for
has been filed under Article 226/227
er for issuance of an appropriate writ
quashing the action of respondents for
itioners in spite of judgment dated
WP-2326-2011 of this Court in case
us State of Haryana and others
in the nature of mandamus directing
ices of petitioners who are working
than 13 to 34 years in view of policies
nnexure P-5 and P- 6) issued by the
ioners
ondents
s.
6/227
writ
nts for
dated
n case
ers.
ecting
rking
licies
y the
PUNEET CHAWLA
2026.01.09 14:10
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-8143-
respondent-
this Court for
2.
extent that th
and the same
order after af
3.
claim of the
accordance w
4.
for the peti
respondents
representation
order, after a
months from
decision take
5.
sought, the sa
6.
of accordingl
January 08
P.C
2
-2023
-Department as well as in v iew o
urt for regularizing the services of par
Learned counsel for the petition
that the present petition be treated as
same be decided in a time bound
fter affording an opportunity of being
Learned counsel for responden
f the petitioners would be considered
ance with law by respondent(s)/compe
Therefore, in view of the submi
e petitioner s, the present writ p eti
s/competent authority is directed
ntation and consider the claim of the
after affording them an opportunity to
s from the date of receiving a certified
n taken thereof shall be conveyed to th
Needless to say, if the petitioner
, the same shall be granted forthwith by
Pending miscellaneous applicati
rdingly.
ry 08, 2026
Whether speaking/reasone
Whether Reportable. :
iew of various judgments passed by
of part time employees.
etitioners has limited his prayer to the
ted as a comprehensive representation
ound manner by passing a speaking
being heard.
ondents No.2 to 9 submits that the
idered by passing a speaking order in
competent authority.
submission made by learned counsel
etition is disposed of and the
irected to treat the writ petition as
of the petitioners and pass a speaking
nity to be heard, within a period of 03
rtified copy of this order. Further, the
d to the petitioners.
itioners are found entitled to the relief
with by the respondents.
plication(s), if any, be also disposed
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR)
JUDGE
easoned. : Yes/No
Yes/No
ed by
to the
tation
aking
at the
der in
unsel
d the
on as
aking
03
er, the
relief
posed
RAR)
PUNEET CHAWLA
2026.01.09 14:10
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document