COCP/3654/2023 of SAMIR ASIJA AND ANOTHER Vs SAURABH GARG AND ANOTHER

IN TH 204 Samir Asij Sh. Saurab Empowerm another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Asija and a was allowe COCP-3654-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3654 o Date of decision ir Asija and another Versus aurabh Garg, IAS, Secretary, Mini owerment, Govt. of India, Shashtri AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. R.D. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 21.3.2023 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP -10 and another vs. Union of India and ot allowed with the following directions : “i) The respondents petitioner no.2, within a today, the details of a provide similar lifetime respondent no.5 and w grants-in-aid from Gove ii) Upon furnishing the petitioner no.2 with he may, if he so choo no.2, within one month 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3654 of 2023 (O & M) cision :-08.01.2026 …..Petitioners , Ministry of Social Justice and ashtri Bhawan, New Delhi and …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-4) passed by a co- 10727-2017 titled as “Samir and others”, whereby the petition tions :- ents no.1 and 2 shall inform the hin a period of one month from of all such institutions which time rehabilitation and care as d which such institutes receive Government of India; hing a list of such Institutes to within the period as aforesaid, hooses, inform the respondent onth thereafter about the place VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.09 17.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-3654-2023 (O & M) where he intends to lifetime rehabilitation a iii) In the event of th get petitioner no.1 r Institute providing su respondent no.5 for the the respondent no.2 arrangements for admi such institute; iv) The amount of Rs be refunded by respond 24.03.2009 shall be de aid assigned for respo released in favour of petitioner no.2 has exer the re-admission of th remainder of his lifetim petitioner would be en 10,00,000/- along with date of passing of the o its actual disburseme retention of such mone Institute. v) In event, the p exercise the op tion petitioner no.1 to any ot Rs.10,00,000/- along w shall be refunded to the of six weeks' of exercise vi) In case the gr respondent no.5 is l assessed along with int deducted in installment 2 to house petitioner no.1 for on and care; of the petitioner no.2 opting to .1 re -admitted to any other such similar facilities as r the remainder of his lifetime, no.2 shall make adequate admission of petitioner no.1 to of Rs.10,00,000/- as directed to pondent no.2 vide order dated e deducted from the grants -in- respondent no.5 and shall be of the Institute for which the exercised the option for seeking of the petitioner no.1 for the fetime and to his account. The e entitled to the amount of Rs. ith interest @ 6% p.a from the the order dated 24.03.2009 till ement on account of undue money by the respondent no.5 he petitioner no.2 does not on to seek re -admission of ny other Institute, the amount of ng with interest as aforesaid o the petitioner within a period rcise of such option; e grant in aid as signed to is less than the amount so h interest, the amount shall be ents spanning over next years, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.09 17.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document submits tha the present same may b the petition been rende January 08 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-3654-2023 (O & M) however, the interest fo also be calculated; vii) The respondent n any amount for the pe stayed there since the from the corpus depo recovered its expens earned and by retaining ordered by respondent n At the very outset, learned c its that since the entire payment has b resent contempt petition has been ren may be disposed of as such. Heard. In view of the submissions m etitioners, the present contempt petitio rendered infructuous. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, ary 08, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 st for the unpaid amount shali ent no.5 is no t being extended e period when petitioner no.1 the expenses were to be met deposited. The Institute thus penses from interest/income ining the money till refund was ent no.2...” rned counsel for the petitioners t has been made to the petitioners, een rendered infructuous and the ions made by learned counsel for petition is disposed of as having if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.09 17.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document