CRLMB/5999/2026 of DILSHAD S/O JAFRU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

[2026:RJ-JP:18150] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5999/2026 Dilshad S/o Jafru, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Sooda Ka, Police Station Sadar Nuh, District Nuh, Haryana. (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Singhal with Ms. Saroj Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 29/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.85/2024 registered at Police Station Januthar, District Deeg for offences under Sections 121(1), 132, 109(1) and 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023, Sections 3, 5, 25 and 25(6) of Arms Act and Sections 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 of Rajasthan Bovine Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the co-accused, Jamshed, who was arrested in connection with the present case, has been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court vide order dated 03.06.2025. Similarly, Aarif has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on 07.02.2025. It is [2026:RJ-JP:18150] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5999/2026] also submitted that the petitioner has been involved in this case entirely on the ground of being the registered owner of the vehicle. The petitioner has been in custody since 14.02.2026. Though seven criminal cases have been reported against the petitioner but it is noted that the petitioner has been granted bail in all previous cases. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Dilshad S/o Jafru, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) That the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Januthar, District Deeg in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. [2026:RJ-JP:18150] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5999/2026] (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/63