CRLMB/6181/2026 of MAHIPAL S/O MUNNALAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

[2026:RJ-JP:17410] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6181/2026 Mahipal S/o Munnalal, R/o Village Kanchanpur, P.S. Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (Accused Petitioner Confined At District Jail Badi) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurajar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 24/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 43/2026 registered at Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 351(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; petitioner is behind the bars since 05.04.2026; He also submits that it is a case of cross- FIR; injuries sustained by the injured are not dangerous to life. Recovery has already been effected from the petitioner. He further submits that out of five cases instituted against the petitioner, he has already been acquitted in three cases; petitioner is not required for further investigation; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the [2026:RJ-JP:17410] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6181/2026] petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are five criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 05.04.2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Mahipal S/o Munnalal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:17410] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6181/2026] 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/62