CMA/3719/2023 of SANJU BAI W/O LATE BALKISHAN Vs CHOLA MANDAL MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

[2026:RJ-JP:16931] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3719/2023 1. Sanju Bai W/o Late Balkishan, aged about 37 Years, 2. Rohit S/o Late Balkishan, aged about 17 Years, minor through Natural Guardian / Mother Sanju Bai, 3. Aaryan S/o Late Balkishan, aged about 13 Years, minor through Natural Guardian / Mother Sanju Bai, 4. Kailash Bai W/o Chhitar Lal, aged about 72 Years, All R/o Village Pandooda, Tehsil Anta, Distt. Baran (Raj.) ----Appellants Versus 1. Chola Mandal Ms General Insurance Company Limited, Regional Management Office, Jaipur (Insurer Trolla No. RJ-09-GD-8605) Complete Add. Unit No. 704-707, 7 th Floor, Signature Tower, DC-2, Lalkothi Scheme District Shopping Center, Tonk Road, Jaipur 302015 2. Rajmal Prajapat S/o Modiram Prajapat, R/o Paarsoli, Tehsil Baingu, Distt. Chittorgarh (Driver Trolla No. RJ-09- GD-8605) 3. Ramesh Gujar S/o Baalu Lal Gujar, R/o Bagpaachhali Khedi, Dist. Chittorgarh (Regd. Owner Trolla No. RJ-09- GD-8605) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni & Mr. Amit Agarwal for Mr. Virendra Agarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 22/04/2026 1. This appeal has been filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the appellants-claimants (for short the ‘claimants’) against the judgment and award dated 21.09.2023 [2026:RJ-JP:16931] (2 of 2) [CMA-3719/2023] passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, No.2, Kota in M.A.C. Case No. 64/2021 (344/2021), whereby claim petition filed by the claimants was partly allowed. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that during the pendency of this appeal, the parties have resolved their dispute amicably by way of a compromise and pray that the present appeal be disposed of in light of the said compromise. 3. A copy of memo of compromise duly signed by learned counsel for the claimant and the Insurance Company, has been placed on record on 02.04.2026. On a specific query by this Court, learned counsel for the parties submit that they are duly authorized by their respective parties to execute the memo of compromise, which reads as under:- "The humble claimants-appellants and respondent no.1 have entered into the compromise on the terms that the insurance company is ready and willing to make further enhancement of the com - pensation lump sum amount to the tune of Rs.2,40,000/- (Rs. Two Lacs Forty Thousand only) in all be paid through Saving Bank Account mean - ing thereby the insurance company would make the payment of Rs.2,40,000/- (Rs. Two Lacs Forty Thousand only) in addition to the amount already paid by the insurance company, within two months from the date of passing the order on the basis of compromise, failing which it will carry interest @ 6% per annum thereafter till actual payment." 4. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J 71/- Dharmendra