BAIL/14282/2026 of KARAN Vs STATE OF U.P.

Allahabad High Court · 2026

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14282 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 83 of 2026 under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) BNS and 4/25 Arms Act registered at Police Station Jani, District Meerut during pendency of the trial. 3. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused Vivek and Anurag have been granted bail vide orders dated 20.4.2026 and 07.4.2026 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application Nos. 11975 of 2026 and 11710 of 2026 respectively. It is further submitted that as per the FIR, applicant and two other co-accused persons Anurag and Vivek are said to have assaulted the injured by sharp-edged weapon, however, injury no.1 received by the injured i.e. son of the informant is said to have been caused by sharp-edged weapon and the same has been found to be simple in nature. It is also submitted that the applicant is in jail since 11.2.2026 and he undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant. 5. As per allegations in the FIR, applicant and two other accused persons Anurag and Vivek are said to have assaulted the son of the first informant by sharp edged weapon due to which, he is said to have receive one injury of sharp-edged weapon which is found to be grievous in nature but the same is not found to be dangerous to life. The injured has assigned specific role of assault to the applicant and co-accused Vivek who has already been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Om Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Karan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected from record and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is ALLOWED. 7. Let the applicant Karan involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions :- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order. May 6, 2026 Madhurima BAIL No. 14282 of 2026 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad