BAIL/41345/2025 of RAMVEER AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41345 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. The present bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicants on bail in Case Crime No. 283 of 2025, under Sections 333, 191(2), 125, 115(2), 118(2), 352 and 351(3) BNS, Police Station Jamunapar, District Mathura, during the pendency of the trial. Learned counsel for applicants has submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the subject case. Learned counsel submits that applicants have not committed the alleged crime as well as there is no independent witness of the alleged incident. The applicants have no criminal history except present case. The applicants are in jail since 04.10.2025. Further submission is that similarly placed co-accused of the applicants has already granted bail vide order dated 17.3.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5633 of 2026 (Nitin vs. State of U.P.). Learned counsel for the applicants has further submitted that if the applicants are released on bail on parity, they would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the trial. Learned A.G.A. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is no illegality in the bail rejection order, but does not dispute the fact that similarly placed co-accused of the applicants has already granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akash Singh, Mohd. Jaid, Rohit Shukla, Shivam Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramveer And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Having heard counsel for the parties and having perused the record this Court prima facie finds that a vague and general role has been assigned to the applicants.  At this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence. Co-accused of the applicants has already granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Further, the applicants have remained confined for more than seven months and there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, more so when no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicants, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on bail. Bail Application is allowed.  Let the applicants-Ramveer and Susheel, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he: (i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; (ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. May 5, 2026 Brijesh BAIL No. 41345 of 2025 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad