NA528/48248/2025 of MOHD. ARSHAD AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 48248 of 2025
Court No. - 74
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the
opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A for the State.
2. This 528 B.N.S.S. application has been filed by the applicants for
quashing the entire criminal proceeding in Complaint Case No.1183 of
2024 (Afsana Khan vs. Mohd.Arshad and others), under section 12 of the
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Police Station
Bhoganipur, District Kanpur Dehat, pending in the court of learned Civil
Judge (Senior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, F.T.C. (Crime against
Women), Kanpur Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the opposite party no.2
lodged proceeding under section 12 Domestic Violence Act against the
applicants, is malice prosecution only to harass the applicants. Applicant
No.1 is husband and applicant nos. 2 to 4 are in-laws of opposite party
no.2. Prima-facie no offence under alleged section is made out against the
applicants. Issuance of notice by learned magistrate is without application
of judicial mind. It is alleged in the complaint that opposite party no.2
marriage was solemnized with the applicant no.1 in the year 2024
thereafter, on account of some domestic dispute, opposite party no.2 was
ousted from her matrimonial house, then present complaint has lodged.
4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2
vehemently opposed the submission raised by learned counsel for the
Versus
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Dwivedi, Farooq
Qamar Khan, Mohammad Belal,
Nafees Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Atal Bihari Tripathi, Shyam
Kishore Tripathi, G.A.
Mohd. Arshad And 3 Others
.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
applicants and submitted that earlier notice was issued against the
applicants and applicants should appear before the trial court and may file
objection there.
5. Considered the argument raised by learned counsel for the applicants
and perused the record. From the record, it is admitted fact that opposite
party no.2 is legally wedded wife of applicant no.1 and after marriage she
lived with the applicants. Thereafter on account of some domestic
dispute, present complaint has lodged and only notice has been issued
against the applicants and applicants have challenged the notice. From
perusal of complaint under section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, prima-
facie offence disclose against the applicants. Notice issued by learned
magistrate is just and proper. Moreover, applicants have remedy to file
objection before magistrate. Prayer for quashing the complaint is, hereby,
refused. However, if applicants file objection before trial court, same shall
be decided after hearing the parties expeditiously in accordance with law.
6. With these observations, the application u/s 528 B.N.S.S. is disposed
of.
April 20, 2026
SKD
NA528 No. 48248 of 2025
2
(Deepak Verma,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SURJIT KUMAR DEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad