CRR/512/2026 of MANISHA BAHADUR @ MONISHA BAHADUR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
23.
24-02-2026
(ct. no.34)
debajyoti
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
CRR 512 of 2026
In re : An application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita corresponding to Section
482 of the Code of Crim inal Procedure read with
Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
-And-
In the matter of : Manisha Bahadur @ Monisha Bahadur
Dr. Achin Jana, Adv.,
Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh, Adv.,
Ms. Chetna Rustagi, Adv.,
Mr. Debojyoti Kumar, Adv.
… For the Petitioner.
1. This revisional application has been filed for a direction of
expeditious disposal of Misc. Execution Case No.144 of 2023
pending before the learned Judicial Ma gistrate, 2 nd Court,
Chandannagore, Hooghly.
2. The crux of the matter that can be gathered from the
submission advanced on behalf of the petitioner as well as
going through the revisional application that an order of
maintenance was passed directing Rs.8,000/- to be paid to the
petitioner which was not paid regularly, as a result there was
an accumulation of an outstanding amount of
Rs.3,84,00,000/-. The case was put into execution in the year
2023 and only Rs.58,000/ - as on date has been paid. The
petitioner wife is highly prejudiced because of the delay caused
by the executing court. Lastly, the petitioner’s effort to raise
the issue of non -maintainability of this execution proceeding
was not pressed in the Month of March, 2025. Despite that, no
date was fixed for hearing of this execution application.
3. On careful perusal of the facts and circumstances and
the certified copies of the orders passed on various dates by
the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 2 nd Court,
2
Chandanngore, Hooghly, this Court fails to understand as to
why the date is not fixed for hearing of the execution
proceeding on the date s fixed excepting th e direction to the
J.C. to receive an amount from the opposite party. The matter
is pending since 2023 and the learned Ma gistrate must
consider the urgency involved in this case as it pertains to the
order of maintenance granted in favour of the petitioner wife
which has not been complied with by the husband. Therefore,
the learned court is directed to dispose of this execu tion case
as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary
adjournments to either of the parties and preferably within a
period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order.
4. The revisional application is, thus, disposed of.
5. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned court to
taking appropriate steps.
6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order
duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
7. Criminal Section is directed to supply certified copies of
this order to the parties, if applied for, upon complianc e of all
necessary formalities.
[Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.]