WPA/12330/2025 of ASHOK MONDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
13.02.2026
Sl. No.7(DL)
Ct. No.14
srm
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
W.P.A. 12330 of 2025
Ashok Mondal
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Firdous Samim,
Ms. Gopa Biswas,
Mr. Hazanuz Zaman Molla,
Mr. Hasibur Rahaman Jamadar
…for the Petitioner.
Mr. Santanu Kumar Mitra,
Mr. Subhabrata Das
…for the State.
Mr. Avishek Prasad
…for the DPSC, Malda.
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks
direction upon the respondent authorities particularly
respondent No.3, the Commissioner of School
Education, Government of West Bengal to consider the
representation of the petitioner dated 9 th May, 2025 for
grant of ‘A’ category scale of pay.
2. The petitioner contends that he is an Assistant Teacher
appointed on 27 th June 2022 pursuant to the
notification issued by the DPSC, Malda in the year
2009-2010. The petitioner has not yet completed six
months bridge course. The petitioner possesses B.Ed
qualification. On 9 th May, 2025 the petitioner made a
representation for grant of ‘A’ category scale of pay .
However, the same is still pending consideration. Hence,
this writ petition.
3. Mr. Firdous Samim, learned Advocate appearing for the
petitioner submits that in similar circumstances this
2
Hon’ble Court has directed for consideration of the
representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.
He seeks that similar direction be issued by relegating
the matter to the appropriate authority for due
consideration. In support of his contention, he relies on
the following decision:
(i) Waliur Rahaman & Ors. versus The State of West
Bengal & Ors. (In Re: MAT 1038 of 2024);
(ii) Khokan Das versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
(In Re: WPA 13023 of 2025);
(iii) Mahammad Enamul Haque versus The State of West
Bengal & Ors. (In Re: WPA 29672 of 2024) ;
(iv) Rezaul Saikh & Ors. versus The State of West
Bengal & Ors. (In Re: WPA 22526 of 2024).
(v) Tuhin Hossain versus The State of West Bengal &
Ors. (In Re: WPA 19110 of 2025).
4. Mr. Avishek Prasad, learned Advocate appearing for the
District Primary School Council, Malda submits that
Commissioner of School Education, Government of West
Bengal is the appropriate authority to consider the
prayer of the petitioner for grant of ‘A’ category scale of
pay. Further in similar circumstances, this Court has
passed order for consideration of the representation. He
also indicates that though this Court on 24 th June,
2025 directed for filing affidavits, however, the District
Primary School Council, Malda will not file any affidavit-
in-opposition.
5. Mr. Subhabrata Das, learned Advocate appearing for the
State submits that the matter may be relegated to the
appropriate authority for due consideration. He also
3
indicates that the State will not file any affidavit-in-
opposition in terms of the earlier order of this Court.
6. In the earlier writ petitions in Khokan Das (supra) ,
Mahammad Enamul Haque (supra), Rezaul Saikh
(supra) and Tuhin Hossain (supra), the appropriate
authority was directed to consider the representations
of the petitioners therein claiming ‘A’ category scale of
pay.
7. In line with the aforesaid decisions, respondent No.3,
the Commissioner of School Education, Government of
West Bengal is directed to consider the representation of
the petitioner dated 9 th May, 2025 and dispose of the
same by passing a reasoned order in accordance with
law upon notice to the petitioner within a period of eight
weeks from the date of communication of this order.
8. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to
communicate this order to the respondent No.3, the
Commissioner of School Education, Government of West
Bengal, for necessary compliance.
9. With the above direction, the writ petition being WPA
12330 of 2025 stands disposed of.
10. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation
made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted.
11. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
12. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of.
13. There shall be no order as to costs.
4
14. All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of
the order duly downloaded from the official website of
this Court.
15. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied
for, be given to the parties on compliance of all
necessary legal formalities.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)