WPA/17635/2025 of SWAPAN PAL Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
g.b.
02
19.01.
2026
Ct. No.03
WPA 17635 of 2025
Swapan Pal
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sabyasachi Mukherjee
Mr. Mrinmoy Nandy
Ms. Swastika Saha
Mr. Ranabeer Halder
Mr. Siddhartha Kundu
Ms. Anushka Bose
Ms. Debjani Chakraborty
…….For the Petitioner
Ms. Sanchayita De
…..For the State
Mr. Ayan Banerjee
Mr. Dhiman Banerjee
…..For the Municipality
1. In terms of the orders dated 2nd January, 2026 and
14th January, 2026 the additional affidavit filed by
the respondent no.6 in court is taken on record.
2. Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate representing the
Municipality at the very outset would submit that
the entire amount to the extent of Rs. 7,30,000/-,
payable on account of gratuity to the petitioner,
has already been made over to the petitioner. In so
far as the interest component is concerned, he
submits that this Hon’ble Court should limit such
interest @ 6 per cent per annum, considering the
financial constraints faced by the municipality. He
submits that since the municipality has already
disbursed the entire amount of gratuity in favour of
WPA 17635 of 2025 2
the petitioner, having regard to the observations
made in paragraph 6 of the aforesaid order dated
14th January, 2026 which exempted personal
appearance of the respondent no.6 and the
Chairman of the municipality, in the event the
entire amount was paid, the said respondents are
not personally present in court.
3. Ms. Chakraborty, learned advocate representing
the petitioner, on the other hand, would submit
that an employee is entitled to the gratuity
immediately upon his/her retirement. In the
instant case the gratuity has been held back.
Financial constraints cannot be a ground to be
withhold gratuity.
4. Since, the gratuity has not been disbursed in time,
a right has accrued in favour of the petitioner to
claim interest. Accordingly, the petitioner is
entitled to interest @ 10 per cent per annum on the
delayed payment of gratuity. In support of her
aforesaid contention reliance has been placed in an
unreported Judgement delivered by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the case of “Gagan Bihari
Prusty Vs. Paradip Port Trust & Ors:” in SLP (
C)No. 4468 of 2022 dated 3rd March, 2025.
5. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for
the respective parties and noting that the statute
mandates interest @ 10 per cent per annum on
WPA 17635 of 2025 3
delayed payment of gratuity , I am of the view that
in the instant case the municipality should be
directed to make payment of the interest @ 10 per
cent per annum on the amount which was paid
belatedly by computing interest @ 10 per cent per
annum from the date when the same became due
till the date of making actual payment.
6. At the same time also noting that the municipality
has submitted that the arrear pension has already
been processed and the same is likely to be
disbursed in favour of the petitioner, I am of the
view that nothing further survives in the matter
and the affidavits filed by the respondent no.6 and
the Chairman of the municipality do not require
further consideration.
7. The writ petition stands disposed of with a
direction that the arrear payment on account of
pension be disbursed within a month from date.
The interest also paid at the earliest.
8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be supplied to the parties on urgent
basis after completion of all necessary formalities.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
WPA 17635 of 2025 4