WPA/20416/2024 of DIBAKAR DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
42
27.01.2026
Ct. No. 18
SB
In The High Court At Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA 20416 of 2024
Dibakar Das
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Rama Halder
Ms. Eshita Mandal … for the petitioner
Mr. Arindam Chattopadhyay
Ms. Lipika Chatterjee … for the State
Md. Manuwar Ali
Ms. Nandita Kundu … for respondent no. 6
Ms. Bratati Dutta …. for respondent nos. 7 & 8
1. The matter relates to the change of nominee in the service
records of the retired employee.
2. It appears that the respondent no. 6 Arati Maity (Das) was the
erstwhile wife of the petitioner. The marriage between the
parties stood dissolved by a decree of divorce granted by the
learned District Judge, Alipur in Matrimonial Suit No. 335 of
1996 vide order dated 09.01.1987. The divorced wife of the
petitioner is receiving regular maintenance from him.
3. The petitioner has since remarried and intends to incorporate
the name of his present wife in his service records.
4. Learned advocate representing the school submits that the
petitioner is unable to produce the original decree of divorce.
5. Learned advocate representing the divorced wife submits that
decree of divorce was not drawn up by the petitioner at any
point of time.
2
6. Upon hearing the submissions made on behalf of all the
parties, it appears that, admittedly, an order dissolving the
marriage was passed by the learned Court on 09.01.1987.
The order of divorce passed by the learned District Judge
was not challenged by either of the parties and the same has
attained finality by now. The petitioner has remarried on
03.03.2019. The divorced wife of the petitioner is receiving
regular maintenance. The marriage between the petitioner
and the private respondent stood dissolved long back. The
private respondent does not have any locus to interfere with
the service matter of her divorced husband.
7. The school would be bound to accept the prayer of the
petitioner to remove the name of his divorced wife Smt. Arati
Maity (Das) from his service records.
8. On production of the original marriage certificate of the
petitioner with Mangala Das, the present wife of the
petitioner, the school shall take steps to incorporate the name
of the present wife of the petitioner.
9. The school shall not insist upon the petitioner for production
of the original decree and will act on the basis of the certified
copy of the order dated 09.01.1987 and original marriage
certificate of the petitioner with Mangala Das.
10. Steps shall be taken in the matter by the school authority at
the earlier but positively within a period of four weeks from
the date of production of the documents mentioned in the
preceding paragraph of this order.
11. After rectification the updated service records of the petitioner
shall be forwarded to the District Inspector of Schools for
taking consequential steps at the earliest.
3
12. The writ petition stands disposed of.
13. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be
given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary
formalities.
14. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order
duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)