Delhi Development Authority vs Ishwar Singh .
Cited by 1 judgment in this corpus
- DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. TEJPAL & ORS. · 2024 INSC 456
These judgments mention this one. Whether each followed, distinguished or doubted it is not recorded here — read them before relying on any of it.
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6078 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 14419 OF 2017 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) .....CC 19842 OF 2016 ]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s)
VERSUS
ISHWAR SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)
KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. Admittedly, the compensation has not been paid to
the land owner(s). Therefore, the High Court is
right in its conclusion that the proceedings have
lapsed. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
4. However, in the peculiar facts and circumstances
of this case, the appellant is given a period of six
months to exercise its liberty granted under Section
24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the
acquisition proceedings afresh.
5. We make it clear that in case no fresh
acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said
period of one year from today by issuing a
Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the 2
appellant, if in possession, shall return the
physical possession of the land to the original land
owner.
6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
No costs.
.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J. [ R. BANUMATHI ]
New Delhi;
May 02, 2017.
3
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 19842/2016
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/03/2016 in WPC No. 9125/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ISHWAR SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)
I.A. 1/2016 (with c/delay in filing SLP)
Date : 02/05/2017 This application was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Katyan, Adv.
Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.
Mr. Avtar Singh Chouhan, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable
Judgment.
Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed
of.
(Jayant Kumar Arora) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Assistant Registrar
(Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file) 4