Ram Sewak vs State Of U.P.

Vakalatnama filed today in Court by Sri Venu Gopal, Advocate, on behalf of the first informant is taken on record. Heard Sri A. K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ramendra Pal Singh, learned AGA for the State-Respondent, Sri Venu Gopal, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 811 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S., Police Station Faridpur, District Bareilly. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the allegation of entangling various girls in love affair by the applicant is false. The applicant is 40 years old and he has not committed such crime. He submits that there is no evidence which reflects that the applicant made multiple certificates to show his date of birth lower to entangle the girls. He submits that the allegation of sexual exploitation of various girls are concocted and has been leveled due to malafide intention. He submits that no credible evidence has been found against the applicant by the Investigating Officer. He submits that there is no independent witness of the alleged incident. He submits that in the present case, charge-sheet has been filed on 15.12.2025 and cognizance has also been taken by the court concerned on 01.01.2026 as such the applicant is not required for any custodial interrogation. The applicant is languishing in jail since 07.10.2025. He submits that the applicant has criminal antecedent of one case to his credit which has been explained in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. He submits that there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, the bail has been prayed for. Learned counsel for the AGA has vehemently opposed, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact raised by learned counsel for the applicant. Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima-facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Ram Sewak, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) May 6, 2026 pks